Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorBaser, Ülkü
dc.contributor.authorGermen, Meliha
dc.contributor.authorLacin, Cagdas Caglar
dc.contributor.authorFıratlı, Erhan
dc.contributor.authorYalcin, Funda
dc.contributor.authorİşsever, Halim
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-10T09:49:57Z
dc.date.available2021-12-10T09:49:57Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationGermen M., Baser Ü., Lacin C. C. , Fıratlı E., İşsever H., Yalcin F., "Periodontitis Prevalence, Severity, and Risk Factors: A Comparison of the AAP/CDC Case Definition and the EFP/AAP Classification", INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, cilt.18, sa.7, 2021
dc.identifier.issn1660-4601
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_157f46be-e04b-4446-ac7b-56146d62a67f
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/168579
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073459
dc.identifier.urihttps://avesis.istanbul.edu.tr/api/publication/157f46be-e04b-4446-ac7b-56146d62a67f/file
dc.description.abstractBackground: This cross-sectional study evaluated the utility of the 2018 European Federation of Periodontology/American Academy of Periodontology (EFP/AAP) classifications of epidemiological studies in terms of periodontitis severity, prevalence and associated risk factors and the 2012 American Academy of Periodontology/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (AAP/CDC) case definitions. Methods: We included 488 participants aged 35-74 years. Measurements were recorded at six sites per tooth by two qualified examiners. The evaluated parameters included pocket depth (PD), clinical attachment loss (CAL) and bleeding on probing (BOP). Periodontitis prevalence and severity were reported using the 2018 EFP/AAP classification and the AAP/CDC case definitions. The data were stratified by recognized risk factors (age, diabetes and smoking status). Results: The 2018 EFP/AAP classification indicated that all patients suffered from periodontitis. When CAL served as the main criterion, the frequency of patients with severe (Stages III-IV) periodontitis was 54%. When the AAP/CDC case definitions were applied, the prevalence of periodontitis was 61.9% and that of severe periodontitis 16.8%. Age was the most significant risk factor, regardless of the chosen case definition. Conclusion: It is essential to employ a globalized standard case definition when monitoring periodontitis and associated risk factors.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectEpidemiology
dc.subjectPhysical Sciences
dc.subjectLife Sciences
dc.subjectHealth Sciences
dc.subjectSocial Sciences & Humanities
dc.subjectÇEVRE BİLİMLERİ
dc.subjectÇevre / Ekoloji
dc.subjectTarım ve Çevre Bilimleri (AGE)
dc.subjectKAMU, ÇEVRE VE İŞ SAĞLIĞI
dc.subjectSosyal Bilimler Genel
dc.subjectSosyal Bilimler (SOC)
dc.subjectSosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler
dc.subjectSosyoloji
dc.subjectTarımsal Bilimler
dc.subjectÇevre Mühendisliği
dc.subjectMühendislik ve Teknoloji
dc.subjectAquatic Science
dc.subjectSafety Research
dc.subjectGeneral Social Sciences
dc.subjectHealth (social science)
dc.subjectNature and Landscape Conservation
dc.subjectEnvironmental Science (miscellaneous)
dc.subjectPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
dc.subjectOccupational Therapy
dc.titlePeriodontitis Prevalence, Severity, and Risk Factors: A Comparison of the AAP/CDC Case Definition and the EFP/AAP Classification
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH
dc.contributor.department, ,
dc.identifier.volume18
dc.identifier.issue7
dc.contributor.firstauthorID2607268


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster