Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAydin, Muhammed Sukru
dc.contributor.authorKUMRU, ASİYE
dc.contributor.authorKarakelle, Sema
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-04T14:25:31Z
dc.date.available2022-07-04T14:25:31Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationAydin M. S. , Karakelle S., KUMRU A., "The Reliability and Validity Study of the Reasonability of Prosocial Lie Test - Child Form", CYPRUS TURKISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHOLOGY, cilt.4, sa.1, ss.34-42, 2022
dc.identifier.issn1302-7840
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_783d59ba-e7e7-43d4-bad4-d59ecd65de55
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/183364
dc.identifier.urihttps://avesis.istanbul.edu.tr/api/publication/783d59ba-e7e7-43d4-bad4-d59ecd65de55/file
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.35365/ctjpp.22.1.04
dc.description.abstractChildren's perceptions of lying behaviors and their evaluations about different types of lies are among the topics discussed in the field. It is seen that the studies conducted on this subject focus on the lies that are told with antisocial and pro social intentions that are opposite to each other. Besides, only a few studies have addressed children's assessments of lies which are told for prosocial reasons. In these studies, it is also known that the researchers used various stories while examining the extent to which children perceive lies as reasonable through different stories. In the current study, it is aimed to conduct the validity and reliability study of the "Reasonability of Prosocial Lie Test - Child Form" in order to see whether the stories whether the stories measure the concept in Turkish sample. In addition, it was investigated for which reasons prosocial lies are more appropriate by focusing on the prosocial type of lying. A total of 277 children, 144 girls and 133 boys, aged between 8 and 13 years, participated in the study. Within the scope of validity studies, an exploratory factor analysis was performed, and it was founded that the final version of the test has an 11-item structure, 6 of which are "politeness lies", 3 of which are "collaborative lies" emerging after someone else's request, and 2 of which are "negative lies" told for own benefit. In addition, the internal consistency coefficients of the test and the test-retest reliability coefficients revealed that the test was also reliable. The results of the analysis showed that the Reasonability of Prosocial Lie Test - Child Form is a valid and reliable measurement tool that can be used to evaluate which types of lies are more appropriate for children in primary and secondary school.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectPsychiatric Mental Health
dc.subjectPsychiatry and Mental Health
dc.subjectSocial Sciences & Humanities
dc.subjectHealth Sciences
dc.subjectSosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler
dc.subjectPsychology (miscellaneous)
dc.subjectGeneral Psychology
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectTemel Bilimler (SCI)
dc.subjectPsikoloji
dc.subjectPSİKOLOJİ, MULTİDİSİPLİNER
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectPsikiyatri
dc.titleThe Reliability and Validity Study of the Reasonability of Prosocial Lie Test - Child Form
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalCYPRUS TURKISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHOLOGY
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi , Edebiyat Fakültesi , Psikoloji Bölümü
dc.identifier.volume4
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage34
dc.identifier.endpage42
dc.contributor.firstauthorID3415442


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record