• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Avesis
  • Dokümanı Olmayanlar
  • Makale
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Avesis
  • Dokümanı Olmayanlar
  • Makale
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Endovascular treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms: Results from a single-team experience of 81 cases including 13 flow diversion treatment.

Author
Aydoseli, Aydin
Sencer, Serra
Sabanci, Pulat Akin
Aras, Yavuz
Sencer, Altay
Dolas, İlyas
Unal, Tugrul Cem
Gulsever, Cafer Ikbal
Sahin, Duran
Huseynov, Heydar
Barburoglu, Mehmet
Ozturk, Onur
Can, Halil
Adiyaman, Ali Ekrem
Dagdeviren, Huseyin Emre
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Introduction:Relatively constant surgical risks and rapid advances in endovascular treatment have caused a major shift toward endovascular management of posterior circulation aneurysms. This paper presents the results of a series of endovascularly treated posterior circulation aneurysms.Methods:A total of 81 patients who underwent endovascular treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms performed by a single team between 2009 and 2019 were included. Demographic, clinical, radiologic, and management details were retrospectively obtained from hospital records.Results:Among the included patients, 50 (61.7%) and 31 (38.3%) were female and male, respectively. Subarachnoid hemorrhage was observed in 30 patients (37%). Moreover, 40 (49.3%) aneurysms were treated with stent-assisted coiling, 1 (1.2%) aneurysm was treated with parent artery occlusion, 2 (2.4%) aneurysms were coiled using balloon assistance, 24 (29.6%) aneurysms were coiled primarily, 1 (1.2%) patient had an unsuccessful treatment attempt, and 13 (16.0%) aneurysms were treated with flow-diverter stents or stent monotherapy. During the last follow-up, 57 (83.8%) aneurysms were completely occluded, whereas 6 (8.8%) and 2 (2.9%) aneurysms did and did not have a residual neck, respectively. Flow diversion was used to treat 13 patients, among whom 8 had total occlusion or stable residue. A total of 7 deaths (8.6%) were encountered in this series.Conclusion:Endovascular treatment should be considered as the primary treatment modality for posterior circulation aneurysms. Despite the high morbidity and mortality rates, promising results can be achieved with correct patient selection. Flow diversion can be a feasible alternative for complex aneurysms that are difficult to treat.Keywords:Aneurisma; Aneurysm; Circulación posterior; Endovascular; Hemorragia subaracnoidea; Posterior circulation; Stent; Subarachnoid hemorrhage.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/188649
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucie.2022.11.022
Collections
  • Makale [92796]

Creative Commons Lisansı

İstanbul Üniversitesi Akademik Arşiv Sistemi (ilgili içerikte aksi belirtilmediği sürece) Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 


Hakkımızda
Açık Erişim PolitikasıVeri Giriş Rehberleriİletişim
sherpa/romeo
Dergi Adı/ISSN || Yayıncı

Exact phrase only All keywords Any

BaşlıkbaşlayaniçerenISSN

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypesThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypes

My Account

LoginRegister

Creative Commons Lisansı

İstanbul Üniversitesi Akademik Arşiv Sistemi (ilgili içerikte aksi belirtilmediği sürece) Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV