Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYildirim, Gulhan
dc.contributor.authorKOCAELLİ, Hümeyra
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-29T12:33:41Z
dc.date.available2023-05-29T12:33:41Z
dc.identifier.citationYildirim G., KOCAELLİ H., "Assessment of the content and quality of YouTube videos related zygomatic implants: A content–quality analysis", Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 2023
dc.identifier.issn1523-0899
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_1b6524a3-410e-47b8-a832-814126bba935
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/188834
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85148580735&origin=inward
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13194
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: This study aimed to evaluate the content and quality of YouTube videos of zygomatic implants. Methods: According to Google Trends (2021), “zygomatic implant” was the most preferred keyword related to the topic. Therefore, in this study “zygomatic implant” was used as a keyword for the video search. Demographic characteristics such as the number of views, likes/dislikes, comments, video duration, number of days after upload, uploaders, and target audiences of the videos were evaluated. To evaluate the accuracy and content quality of videos (available from YouTube), the video information and quality index (VIQI) and global quality scale (GQS) were used. Statistical analyses were performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test, Mann–Whitney U test, chi-square test, Fisher's exact chi-square test, Yates continuity correction, and Spearman correlation analysis (p 0.001). Conversely, information flow, accuracy of information, video quality and precision, and total VIQI scores were statistically different between the groups. The moderate-content group had a higher GQS score than the low-content group (p < 0.001). The videos were mainly uploaded (40%) from hospitals and universities. Most videos were targeted toward professionals (46.75%). Low-content videos had higher ratings than the moderate- and high-content videos. Conclusions: Most YouTube videos on zygomatic implants showed low-content quality. This implies that YouTube is not a reliable source of information on zygomatic implants. Dentists, prosthodontists, and oral and maxillofacial surgeons should be aware of the content of video-sharing platforms and take responsibility for enriching video content.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectDiş Hekimliği
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectDİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ, ORAL CERRAHİ VE TIP
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectAğız Cerrahisi
dc.titleAssessment of the content and quality of YouTube videos related zygomatic implants: A content–quality analysis
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
dc.contributor.departmentT.C. Beykent Üniversitesi , ,
dc.contributor.firstauthorID4255197


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record