Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorAzamat, İbrahim Fethi
dc.contributor.authorErginel, Basak
dc.contributor.authorYanar, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorTaskesen, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorSoysal, Feryal Gun
dc.contributor.authorErsavas, Cenk
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-29T13:06:52Z
dc.date.available2023-05-29T13:06:52Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationErsavas C., Erginel B., Yanar F., Azamat İ. F., Taskesen F., Soysal F. G., "Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT) versus sinus laser therapy (SiLaT) for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus", Wideochirurgia I Inne Techniki Maloinwazyjne, cilt.18, sa.1, ss.144-148, 2023
dc.identifier.issn1895-4588
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_2b9cccd7-9378-4dcb-a96e-5c61d9e80e90
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/188973
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2022.124206
dc.identifier.urihttps://avesis.istanbul.edu.tr/api/publication/2b9cccd7-9378-4dcb-a96e-5c61d9e80e90/file
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: New surgical treatment methods are being investigated in sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease. Minimal invasive methods such as endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT) and sinus laser therapy (SiLaT) have promising results and advantages of laparoscopic surgery. Aim: To compare the efficiency and safety of EPSIT with SiLaT. Material and methods: Seventy-three patients with pilonidal sinus who had undergone EPSIT or SiLaT within 2 years were evaluated retrospectively. Data of patients’ demographics, complications and postoperative course were collected and compared between the two groups. Results: We analyzed seventy-three patients who underwent EPSIT or SiLaT, with a mean age of 23.4 ±8.4 (12–46) years and body mass index (BMI) of 25.5 ±4.5 (18–38) kg/m2. Among them, 36 patients (26 males, ten females) underwent EPSIT and 37 patients (27 males, ten females) underwent SiLaT. Mean operative time was similar for both groups (32.3 ±14.8 vs. 31.0 ±14.8; p = 0.757). Early complications (minimal bleeding) were recorded in 2 patients in the SiLaT group. The duration of analgesic use was significantly lower in the EPSIT group compared to the SiLaT group (1.3 ±0.5 (1–3) vs. 1.9 ±1.1 (1–5); p = 0.005). The mean postoperative time of total wound healing was similar for both groups: 23.6 ±14.7 (12–90) vs. 25.2 ±14.5 (14–90) days (p = 0.385). There was no significant difference in the average time of return to total daily activity (3.4 ±0.9 (2–5) vs. 3.6 ±1.2 (2–7) days, p = 0.679). There were no significant differences between the groups regarding late postoperative complications (recurrence: 7). Conclusions: Both methods have similar early and late complications. The duration of need for analgesic usage was shorter in EPSIT patients.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectGastroenteroloji-(Hepatoloji)
dc.subjectNefroloji
dc.subjectCerrahi Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectKadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectCerrahi
dc.subjectDoğum ve Jinekoloji
dc.subjectGastroenteroloji
dc.subjectÜroloji
dc.subjectİç Hastalıkları
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectKADIN HASTALIKLARI & DOĞUM
dc.subjectGASTROENTEROLOJİ VE HEPATOLOJİ
dc.subjectCERRAHİ
dc.subjectÜROLOJİ VE NEFROLOJİ
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.titleEndoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT) versus sinus laser therapy (SiLaT) for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalWideochirurgia I Inne Techniki Maloinwazyjne
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Arel Üniversitesi , ,
dc.identifier.volume18
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage144
dc.identifier.endpage148
dc.contributor.firstauthorID4266605


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster