Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTemeloğlu Şen, Esin
dc.contributor.authorÖner Gücin, Nuray
dc.contributor.authorÜnver, Buket
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-10T12:56:13Z
dc.date.available2023-10-10T12:56:13Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationÜnver B., Temeloğlu Şen E., Öner Gücin N., "Development and Validation of the Physical Distancing Behavior Scale: A Study Based on the Integrated Behavior Model", Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar, cilt.15, sa.1, ss.261-273, 2023
dc.identifier.issn1309-0658
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_28b98427-1289-47bd-a0e0-d5c0e07308ea
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/190334
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.18863/pgy.1281072
dc.identifier.urihttps://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/pgy/issue/75876/1281072
dc.description.abstractThis paper aims to develop a comprehensive scale within the framework of the Integrated Behavior Model (IBM), which is recommended for the protection of public health during the Covid-19 pandemic period and is the leading physical distancing behavior among health behaviors. Within the scope of the study, an item pool consisting of a total of 109 items was created and the first item analysis was performed in the pilot sample (N= 100). At the end of the pilot study, Physical Distancing Behavior Scale (PDBS) was developed, comprising a total of 39 items. This scale consisted of instrumental attitude, experiential attitude, subjective norms, perceived control, self-efficacy, environmental constraints, knowledge habit, intention, and behavior structures. Af-terwards, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was applied to 322 participants (age: 36.48) resulting in 21 items and five structures including instrumental attitude, experiential attitude, perceived control, self-efficacy, and knowledge. After factor structures according to EFA had been formed, a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was conducted on 472 participants (age: 36,99). The CFA results confirmed 4 constructs consisting of 19 items which are instrumental attitude, experiential attitude, perceived control, and self-efficacy (RMSEA=0.057, GFI=0.93, CFI=0.94, NFI=0.90, X2/df=2.51), Cronbach’s alpha scores of all sub-scales varied between 0.68-0.85. The results revealed that physical distancing behavior has been evaluated through the instrumental attitude, experi-ential attitude, perceived control, and self-efficacy constructs of IBM. In future studies, the scale may also need to be tested with different model studies. As regards the modeling studies that used this scale, examining diffe-rent samples could guide community-based intervention programs.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectUygulamalı Psikoloji
dc.subjectKlinik Psikolojisi
dc.subjectKlinik Psikoloji
dc.subjectPsikoloji (çeşitli)
dc.subjectGenel Psikoloji
dc.subjectSosyal Bilimler ve Beşeri Bilimler
dc.subjectSosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler
dc.subjectPSİKOLOJİ, KLİNİK
dc.subjectPSİKOLOJİ, DENEYSEL
dc.subjectPsikoloji
dc.subjectSosyal Bilimler (SOC)
dc.subjectTemel Bilimler (SCI)
dc.titleDevelopment and Validation of the Physical Distancing Behavior Scale: A Study Based on the Integrated Behavior Model
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalPsikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar
dc.contributor.departmentIşık Üniversitesi , Edebiyat Fakültesi , Psikoloji
dc.identifier.volume15
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage261
dc.identifier.endpage273
dc.contributor.firstauthorID4575317


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record