dc.contributor.author | Temeloğlu Şen, Esin | |
dc.contributor.author | Öner Gücin, Nuray | |
dc.contributor.author | Ünver, Buket | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-10-10T12:56:13Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-10-10T12:56:13Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Ünver B., Temeloğlu Şen E., Öner Gücin N., "Development and Validation of the Physical Distancing Behavior Scale: A Study Based on the Integrated Behavior Model", Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar, cilt.15, sa.1, ss.261-273, 2023 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1309-0658 | |
dc.identifier.other | vv_1032021 | |
dc.identifier.other | av_28b98427-1289-47bd-a0e0-d5c0e07308ea | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/190334 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.18863/pgy.1281072 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/pgy/issue/75876/1281072 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper aims to develop a comprehensive scale within the framework of the Integrated Behavior Model (IBM), which is recommended for the protection of public health during the Covid-19 pandemic period and is the leading physical distancing behavior among health behaviors. Within the scope of the study, an item pool consisting of a total of 109 items was created and the first item analysis was performed in the pilot sample (N= 100). At the end of the pilot study, Physical Distancing Behavior Scale (PDBS) was developed, comprising a total of 39 items. This scale consisted of instrumental attitude, experiential attitude, subjective norms, perceived control, self-efficacy, environmental constraints, knowledge habit, intention, and behavior structures. Af-terwards, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was applied to 322 participants (age: 36.48) resulting in 21 items and five structures including instrumental attitude, experiential attitude, perceived control, self-efficacy, and knowledge. After factor structures according to EFA had been formed, a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was conducted on 472 participants (age: 36,99). The CFA results confirmed 4 constructs consisting of 19 items which are instrumental attitude, experiential attitude, perceived control, and self-efficacy (RMSEA=0.057, GFI=0.93, CFI=0.94, NFI=0.90, X2/df=2.51), Cronbach’s alpha scores of all sub-scales varied between 0.68-0.85. The results revealed that physical distancing behavior has been evaluated through the instrumental attitude, experi-ential attitude, perceived control, and self-efficacy constructs of IBM. In future studies, the scale may also need to be tested with different model studies. As regards the modeling studies that used this scale, examining diffe-rent samples could guide community-based intervention programs. | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.subject | Uygulamalı Psikoloji | |
dc.subject | Klinik Psikolojisi | |
dc.subject | Klinik Psikoloji | |
dc.subject | Psikoloji (çeşitli) | |
dc.subject | Genel Psikoloji | |
dc.subject | Sosyal Bilimler ve Beşeri Bilimler | |
dc.subject | Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler | |
dc.subject | PSİKOLOJİ, KLİNİK | |
dc.subject | PSİKOLOJİ, DENEYSEL | |
dc.subject | Psikoloji | |
dc.subject | Sosyal Bilimler (SOC) | |
dc.subject | Temel Bilimler (SCI) | |
dc.title | Development and Validation of the Physical Distancing Behavior Scale: A Study Based on the Integrated Behavior Model | |
dc.type | Makale | |
dc.relation.journal | Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar | |
dc.contributor.department | Işık Üniversitesi , Edebiyat Fakültesi , Psikoloji | |
dc.identifier.volume | 15 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 261 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 273 | |
dc.contributor.firstauthorID | 4575317 | |