Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorOral, Ethem Nezih
dc.contributor.authorINANC, Selçuk
dc.contributor.authorAYDINER, Adnan
dc.contributor.authorSAIP, Pınar Mualla
dc.contributor.authorTENEKECI, Nesrin
dc.contributor.authorDINCER, M
dc.contributor.authorDEMIR, C
dc.contributor.authorTOPUZ, E
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-05T10:11:05Z
dc.date.available2021-03-05T10:11:05Z
dc.date.issued1999
dc.identifier.citationSAIP P. M. , TENEKECI N., AYDINER A., DINCER M., INANC S., DEMIR C., Oral E. N. , TOPUZ E., "Response evaluation of bone metastases in breast cancer: Value of magnetic resonance imaging", CANCER INVESTIGATION, cilt.17, ss.575-580, 1999
dc.identifier.issn0735-7907
dc.identifier.otherav_a1cd8725-6dce-4b43-a933-3c4c407a320b
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/108388
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3109/07357909909032842
dc.description.abstractThe clinical utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in judging therapeutic response of bone metastases was evaluated in 18 patients with advanced breast cancer Treatment efficacy was assessed by MRI and conventional methods such as plain radiograph, bone scan, pain and analgesic scale, and serum CA15-3. The response by MRI was evaluated mainly on TI-weighted sequences by measuring the volume of the bone lesion and soft tissue component. The patient was assumed to be a conventional responder if a complete or partial response was observed in any of the conventional methods described above. Response was most concordant between plain radiographs and MRI findings (91%, 10/11, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 58.7-99.8). The rate of concordance was 61% (11/18, 95% CI 35.8-82.7) for all conventional methods and MRI. MRI revealed response in four patients in whom progressive disease was observed by bone scan and the marker response was not measurable. This pilot study suggests that posttherapy evaluation with MRI may provide useful clinical information in breast cancer patients with bone metastases and may be a valuable adjunct to conventional methods with conflicting results.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectOnkoloji
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectİç Hastalıkları
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectONKOLOJİ
dc.titleResponse evaluation of bone metastases in breast cancer: Value of magnetic resonance imaging
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalCANCER INVESTIGATION
dc.contributor.department, ,
dc.identifier.volume17
dc.identifier.issue8
dc.identifier.startpage575
dc.identifier.endpage580
dc.contributor.firstauthorID21215


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster