Mammographic density assessed on paired raw and processed digital images and on paired screen-film and digital images across three mammography systems

Author
Bertrand, Kimberly
Lee, Jong Won
Kim, Jisun
Salem, Dorria
Kamal, Rasha
Hartman, Mikael
Miao, Hui
Chia, Kee-Seng
Nagata, Chisato
Vinayak, Sudhir
Ndumia, Rose
Van Gils, Carla H.
Wanders, Johanna O. P.
Peplonska, Beata
Bukowska, Agnieszka
Vinnicombe, Sarah
Moss, Sue
Chiarelli, Anna M.
Linton, Linda
Maskarinec, Gertraud
Yaffe, Martin J.
Boyd, Norman F.
Dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel
Mccormack, Valerie A.
Teo, Soo-Hwang
Mariapun, Shivaani
Taib, Nur Aishah Mohd
Allen, Steve
Burton, Anya
Byrnes, Graham
Stone, Jennifer
Tamimi, Rulla M.
Heine, John
Vachon, Celine
Ozmen, Vahit
Pereira, Ana
Garmendia, Maria Luisa
Scott, Christopher
Hipwell, John H.
Dickens, Caroline
Schuz, Joachim
Aribal, Mustafa Erkin
Kwong, Ava
Giles, Graham G.
Hopper, John
Gomez, Beatriz Perez
Pollan, Marina
Lajous, Martin
Lopez-Riduara, Ruy
Rice, Megan
Romieu, Isabelle
Flugelman, Anath Arzee
Ursin, Giske
Qureshi, Samera
Ma, Huiyan
Lee, Eunjung
Sirous, Reza
Sirous, Mehri
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Background: Inter-women and intra-women comparisons of mammographic density (MD) are needed in research, clinical and screening applications; however, MD measurements are influenced by mammography modality (screen film/digital) and digital image format (raw/processed). We aimed to examine differences in MD assessed on these image types.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/110826
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-016-0787-0
Collections