Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorEmre, Murat
dc.contributor.authorCummings, Jeffrey
dc.contributor.authorAarsland, Dag
dc.contributor.authorTekin, Sibel
dc.contributor.authorDronamraju, Nalina
dc.contributor.authorLane, Roger
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-05T11:35:14Z
dc.date.available2021-03-05T11:35:14Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationCummings J., Emre M., Aarsland D., Tekin S., Dronamraju N., Lane R., "Effects of Rivastigmine in Alzheimer's Disease Patients with and Without Hallucinations", JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE, cilt.20, ss.301-311, 2010
dc.identifier.issn1387-2877
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_a8e6580e-ce9f-4296-b8cf-66f74d185466
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/112868
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3233/jad-2010-1362
dc.description.abstractHallucinations in Alzheimer's disease (AD) may indicate greater cortical cholinergic deficits. Rivastigmine has shown larger treatment benefits versus placebo in dementia with Lewy bodies and Parkinson's disease dementia patients with hallucinations. In this retrospective, hypothesis-generating analysis, we investigated whether hallucinations in AD were associated with greater treatment benefits with rivastigmine. Data were pooled from two randomized, double-blind, 6-month, mild-to-moderate AD trials comparing rivastigmine with placebo. Co-primary efficacy parameters were the Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) and Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change plus Caregiver Input (CIBIC-plus). Efficacy data were analyzed for two sub-populations: those with and those without hallucinations at baseline. Of 927 patients, 194 (21%) reported hallucinations at baseline. Hallucinators tended to have greater decline on placebo on all outcome measures. On the ADAS-cog, mean rivastigmine - placebo differences of 3.7 points in hallucinators and 2.2 points in non-hallucinators were reported at 6 months (both p < 0.001). In hallucinators, a significant rivastigmine - placebo difference of -1.0 points (a beneficial effect) was seen on the CIBIC-plus at 6 months (p < 0.001). Non-hallucinators showed a smaller significant treatment difference of - 0.3 points (p < 0.05). Interaction testing suggested that differences in treatment effects were significant between hallucinators and non-hallucinators. Hallucinations predicted greater treatment responses to oral rivastigmine.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectYaşam Bilimleri
dc.subjectTemel Bilimler
dc.subjectNEUROSCIENCES
dc.subjectSinirbilim ve Davranış
dc.subjectYaşam Bilimleri (LIFE)
dc.titleEffects of Rivastigmine in Alzheimer's Disease Patients with and Without Hallucinations
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of California System , ,
dc.identifier.volume20
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage301
dc.identifier.endpage311
dc.contributor.firstauthorID194815


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster