Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKutay, Omer
dc.contributor.authorGeckili, Onur
dc.contributor.authorGeckili, Esma
dc.contributor.authorBilgin, Tayfun
dc.contributor.authorBilhan, Hakan
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-05T16:06:12Z
dc.date.available2021-03-05T16:06:12Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationGeckili E., Geckili O., Bilhan H., Kutay O., Bilgin T., "Clinical Comparison of Screw-Retained and Screwless Morse Taper Implant-Abutment Connections: One-Year Postloading Results", INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, cilt.32, ss.1123-1131, 2017
dc.identifier.issn0882-2786
dc.identifier.otherav_bf07ead2-010a-459a-b540-7d03ba16c5c2
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/126851
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5314
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The purpose of this study was to clinically evaluate the screwless Morse taper implant-abutment connection type, in which the retention screw is totally eliminated, in terms of stability, success, periodontal parameters, and marginal bone levels after 1 year of function by comparing it with a passive fit internal implantabutment connection, wherein a space exists between the matching components. Materials and Methods: Each edentulous subject received an implant with a screwless Morse taper connection (MT) in the left canine area of the mandible and an implant with a screw-retained implant-abutment connection (SR) in the right canine area of the mandible. All implants were loaded 6 weeks later. All cases were restored with a cemented bar-retained mandibular overdenture opposing a maxillary complete denture. Clinical recalls at 6 months and 12 months postloading were scheduled and the MT and SR implants were compared in terms of success, survival, primary and secondary implant stability, marginal bone loss, soft tissue response, and mechanical complications. The results were statistically analyzed. Results: A total of 20 subjects were included (10 females, 10 males; average age: 61.60 years) and a total of 40 implants were inserted. No implant failure or technical problem was detected for either MT or SR implants. Marginal bone loss around MT and SR implants did not show any significant differences at 6 weeks after surgery (time of loading) or at 6 months or 12 months postloading (P >.05). Periodontal parameters such as gingival index and probing pocket depth of MT and SR implants likewise did not differ significantly at 6 months and 12 months postloading (P >.05). Primary stability values of MT and SR implants did not differ significantly when measured with the insertion torque device (mean of 68.10 Ncm for MT and 64.20 Ncm for SR implants; P =.564), nor when measured with the electronic percussive testing device (mean of -5.30 for the MT and -5.35 for the SR implants; P =.398). However, MT implants showed lower stability at the time of loading (6 weeks) and 6 months postloading (P =.037 and P =.003, respectively). Stability values did not show any significant differences 12 months postloading (P >.05). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this clinical study, it can be concluded that implants with screwless Morse taper and passive fit internal connections show comparable technical and biologic results after 1 year of function.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectDİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ, ORAL CERRAHİ VE TIP
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectDiş Hekimliği
dc.titleClinical Comparison of Screw-Retained and Screwless Morse Taper Implant-Abutment Connections: One-Year Postloading Results
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Okan Üniversitesi , ,
dc.identifier.volume32
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.startpage1123
dc.identifier.endpage1131
dc.contributor.firstauthorID73225


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster