Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorPaksoy, Mahmut
dc.contributor.authorUygun, Nesrin
dc.contributor.authorIpek, Turgut
dc.contributor.authorPolat, Erdal
dc.contributor.authorKayabasi, Bayram
dc.contributor.authorColak, T
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-05T16:56:58Z
dc.date.available2021-03-05T16:56:58Z
dc.date.issued2001
dc.identifier.citationColak T., Ipek T., Paksoy M., Polat E., Uygun N., Kayabasi B., "The effects of cefephim, G-CSF, and sucralfate on bacterial translocation in experimentally induced acute pancreatitis", SURGERY TODAY, cilt.31, ss.502-506, 2001
dc.identifier.issn0941-1291
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_c30c3c27-afcc-403b-86c1-ffaa2776b38e
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/129452
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s005950170109
dc.description.abstractThe preventive effects of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, cefephim, and sucralfate on bacterial translocation in experimentally induced acute pancreatitis were investigated. Forty male Wistar albino rats were used in this study. For each rat, the pancreatobiliary ductus was ligated and hence acute pancreatitis was induced. In the control group, no further procedure was performed. Meanwhile, cefephim as an antibiotic, filgrastim, which is a colony-stimulating factor, and sucralfate were given to the other groups at the specified doses. To inhibit bacterial translocation by preserving the bowel barrier, sucralfate, which is known to have a cytoprotective effect on the gastrointestinal system, was used in high doses. Cefephim 30 mg/kg per day (intramuscularly) in group II, filgrastim 10 mg/kg per day (subcutaneously) in group III, and sucralfate 50 mg/kg per day by 8-F feeding tube gavage into the stomach in group IV were given. The number of bacteria translocated into the mesenteric lymph nodes, pancreas, liver, and spleen in the control group significantly increased in comparison with the other groups (P < 0.05). The average number of leukocytes (per mm(3)) in the control group was significantly higher than that of other groups (P < 0.0001). Regarding the average serum amylase levels, the values of all groups clearly decreased in comparison with the control group (P < 0.0001). Although in the cefephim, filgrastim, and sucralfate groups, (+) pancreatitis was generally seen, in the control group (+ + +) pancreatitis was detected. Bacterial translocation to the mesenteric lymph nodes and pancreas was partially prevented by filgrastim and sucralfate, and was completely prevented by cefephim. We conclude that in the management of acute pancreatitis, the use of the prophylactic antibiotics, sucralfate and filgrastim, may be advantageous.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectCerrahi Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectCERRAHİ
dc.titleThe effects of cefephim, G-CSF, and sucralfate on bacterial translocation in experimentally induced acute pancreatitis
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalSURGERY TODAY
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi , ,
dc.identifier.volume31
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.startpage502
dc.identifier.endpage506
dc.contributor.firstauthorID37398


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster