Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorAlken, Peter
dc.contributor.authorWendt-Nordahl, Gunnar
dc.contributor.authorMut, Tuna
dc.contributor.authorKnoll, Thomas
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-05T17:50:46Z
dc.date.available2021-03-05T17:50:46Z
dc.identifier.citationWendt-Nordahl G., Mut T., Alken P., Knoll T., "Is It Worth Upgrading Your Flexible Ureterorenoscope? A Clinical Analysis", 2nd International Urolithiasis Research Symposium, Indiana, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri, 17 - 18 Nisan 2008, cilt.1049, ss.328-329
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_c7872c18-02f8-4c82-9b7a-0ddfa94d1732
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/132257
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1063/1.2998048
dc.description.abstractThe new generation semiflexible ureterorenoscopes (URS) offer an improved deflection of 270 in both directions and a stiffer sheath. It is postulated that stone access and removal are facilitated compared to the conventional devices. In our study, we aimed to determine the difference in efficacy of stone treatment comparing the new and the conventional flexible URS. A total of 90 patients with upper urinary tract stones were included into a retrospective study. 29 cases were treated with the last generation flexible URS (11274 AA, Karl Storz Endoscopy, Germany) between 01/2000 and 07/2003 and 61 cases were treated with the new flexible URS (Flex-X, Karl Storz Endoscopy. Germany) between 12/2005 and 05/2007. The patients underwent standard clinical and radiological work-up before the procedure. Patients' and stone characteristics, stone free rate and complications were compared between the two groups. Treatment success was defined as complete stone removal or insignificant residual fragments <4mm requiring no further intervention. Stone access was possible in 97% and 100% for the conventional and new URS group. Immediate treatment success was 38% for the conventional versus 70% for the new flexible scope (p=0.0032). For the subgroup of lower pole stones mean stone size was 6.6 mm (conventional scope, 16 patients) versus 5.3 trim (new scope, 51 patients). Stone access was possible in 94% versus 100% and treatment success was 31% versus 69% (p=0.0004) for the old compared to the new scope. No major complications were observed. Minor complications were comparable in both groups. Our study suggests an advantage of the new flexible ureterorenoscopes compared to their predecessors. They offer an increased stone free rate especially in the treatment of lower pole stones.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectÜROLOJİ VE NEFROLOJİ
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectTemel Bilimler
dc.subjectSitogenetik
dc.subjectMoleküler Biyoloji ve Genetik
dc.subjectYaşam Bilimleri
dc.subjectNefroloji
dc.subjectİç Hastalıkları
dc.subjectBİYOKİMYA VE MOLEKÜLER BİYOLOJİ
dc.subjectMoleküler Biyoloji ve Genetik
dc.subjectYaşam Bilimleri (LIFE)
dc.subjectFİZİK, UYGULAMALI
dc.subjectFizik
dc.subjectTemel Bilimler (SCI)
dc.titleIs It Worth Upgrading Your Flexible Ureterorenoscope? A Clinical Analysis
dc.typeBildiri
dc.contributor.departmentRuprecht Karls University Heidelberg , ,
dc.identifier.volume1049
dc.contributor.firstauthorID134558


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster