Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorYaliman, Ayse
dc.contributor.authorAmasyali, Saliha Y.
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-05T19:10:42Z
dc.date.available2021-03-05T19:10:42Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationAmasyali S. Y. , Yaliman A., "Comparison of the effects of mirror therapy and electromyography-triggered neuromuscular stimulation on hand functions in stroke patients: a pilot study", INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, cilt.39, ss.302-307, 2016
dc.identifier.issn0342-5282
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_cdfff735-3e04-4711-8b09-f0c12b51ec59
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/136303
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/mrr.0000000000000186
dc.description.abstractTo determine the effectiveness of mirror therapy and electromyography (EMG)-triggered neuromuscular stimulation on improvement of functions of the upper extremity in patients with subacute stroke in comparison with conventional therapy as well as to evaluate the advantage of each treatment over another, we conducted a prospective, randomized, and controlled trial involving 24 patients with ischemic stroke. The mean age and mean time since stroke of the patients were 58.79 +/- 11.49 years and 5.25 +/- 2.25 months. Patients were assigned randomly to a mirror therapy group (MT group, n= 9), which consisted of therapy with a mirror box 5 days/week, 30 min/day, for 3 weeks, an electrostimulation group (ES group, n= 7), which consisted of therapy with EMG-triggered stimulation (EMG-stim) of similar duration and frequency of treatment as the MT group, and a control group (n= 8). All the groups received conventional physiotherapy for the same period as the MT group. Patients in the MT group practiced their therapy at home after supervised sessions. The Fugl-Meyer scores of the upper extremity, grip force, wrist extension, and Box and Block Test were evaluated at baseline, after treatment, and at 3 months after the treatment. All of these measures were evaluated by a blinded researcher. We found that there was no significant improvement in wrist extension range and grip force in control group. The MT and EMG-stim were effective in increasing the Fugl-Meyer motor scale for upper extremity (MT group: P< 0.01), increasing wrist extension range, grip force, and hand dexterity determined by the Box and Block Test (MT group and ES group P< 0.05). Furthermore, hand skills were increased significantly in the MT group compared with the ES group at the follow-up assessment (P< 0.05). This pilot study suggested that MT was more efficient in improving motor performance than physiotherapy alone. Also, MT may be more useful in improving the hand skills compared with EMG-stim. We assume that this difference might be related to the feasibility of maintenance of MT at home. Copyright (C) 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectFiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectREHABİLİTASYON
dc.titleComparison of the effects of mirror therapy and electromyography-triggered neuromuscular stimulation on hand functions in stroke patients: a pilot study
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH
dc.contributor.departmentAydın Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi , ,
dc.identifier.volume39
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.startpage302
dc.identifier.endpage307
dc.contributor.firstauthorID237223


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster