Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorErdamar, S.
dc.contributor.authorSalihoglu, Z.
dc.contributor.authorKaraca, F. Can
dc.contributor.authorUzun, H.
dc.contributor.authorUlualp, K.
dc.contributor.authorKarataş, Ayten
dc.contributor.authorOzben, V.
dc.contributor.authorAytac, E.
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-02T22:18:19Z
dc.date.available2021-03-02T22:18:19Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationKarataş A., Ozben V., Aytac E., Karaca F. C. , Salihoglu Z., Uzun H., Erdamar S., Ulualp K., "An Alternative Sutureless Repair Technique with Amelogenin for Duodenal Perforation", ACTA CHIRURGICA BELGICA, cilt.112, sa.2, ss.121-125, 2012
dc.identifier.issn0001-5458
dc.identifier.otherav_0bf121fb-7416-4818-9e30-ddce3034c2d8
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/13685
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2012.11680809
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Among the various sutureless techniques, fibrin glue has proved to be effective in the treatment of peptic ulcer perforation as an alternative to classical suture repair. Albeit rare, a potential disadvantage of fibrin glue use is viral transmission or anaphylaxis. The aim of this study is to introduce a new technique for the closure of duodenal perforation using a novel recombinant enamel protein called amelogenin. METHODS: In this case-control experimental study, 32 adult male Wistar Albino rats weighing 250-300 g were randomly divided into four groups, each containing 8 rats. Duodenal perforation of 0.2 cm were performed in the postpyloric region in all rats. Each group received primary repair, primary repair with omentoplasty, fibrin glue, and amelogenin, respectively. All animals were killed on the postoperative day five and the bursting pressure measurements, hydroxyproline levels and histopathologic values of the wound site were evaluated. RESULTS: Bursting pressure levels of the fibrin glue and amelogenin groups were significantly lower than the primary repair and primary repair with omentoplasty groups (P < 0.05) However, no significant difference existed between the fibrin glue and amelogenin groups in this respect (P > 0.05). There was also no statistically significant difference among all groups regarding tissue hydroxyproline levels and histopathologic values (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Application of amelogenin as an alternative sutureless repair technique did not improve wound healing in this animal model of duodenal perforation.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectCERRAHİ
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectCerrahi Tıp Bilimleri
dc.titleAn Alternative Sutureless Repair Technique with Amelogenin for Duodenal Perforation
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalACTA CHIRURGICA BELGICA
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi , Fen-Edebiyat , Moleküler Biyoloji Ve Genetik
dc.identifier.volume112
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.startpage121
dc.identifier.endpage125
dc.contributor.firstauthorID18275


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster