Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorErtekin, Erhan
dc.contributor.authorTukel, Rasit
dc.contributor.authorDevrim-Ucok, Muge
dc.contributor.authorAslantas-Ertekin, Banu
dc.contributor.authorKeskin-Ergen, Yasemin
dc.contributor.authorOflaz, Serap
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-05T19:23:47Z
dc.date.available2021-03-05T19:23:47Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationKeskin-Ergen Y., Tukel R., Aslantas-Ertekin B., Ertekin E., Oflaz S., Devrim-Ucok M., "N2 AND P3 POTENTIALS IN EARLY-ONSET AND LATE-ONSET PATIENTS WITH OBSESSIVE-COMPULSIVE DISORDER", DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY, cilt.31, ss.997-1006, 2014
dc.identifier.issn1091-4269
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_cf123940-ca1f-4697-ba90-10cc3ae15295
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/136944
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/da.22212
dc.description.abstractBackground: Impaired cognitive control processes may be central in the pathogenesis of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Our objective was to evaluate cognitive control processes with event-related potentials in early-onset OCD (EO) and late-onset OCD (LO), which are suggested to have distinct characteristics. Methods: Participants were unmedicated EO (n = 26) and LO patients (n = 33) without comorbid psychopathology and healthy controls (n = 54). Go/No-go tasks with 50 and 80% Go trial probabilities were implemented to manipulate the strength of response conflict and inhibitory demands. Results: LO patients had shorter N2 latencies than controls and did not show the N2 amplitude increase seen in controls with the increase in Go trial probability as suggestive of abnormal conflict monitoring processes. Both EO and LO patients showed smaller P3 increase than controls with the increase in Go trial probability, suggesting problems in modifying attentional control with changes in task demands. P3 was more anteriorly distributed in LO patients than controls. Additionally, P3 increase, with the increase in Go trial probability, was larger in frontal and central sites than in parietal sites in controls, whereas in EO patients it was almost homogenous across anteroposterior sites. Conclusions: N2 processes were affected only in LO, whereas P3 processes were affected in both EO and LO, although, somewhat differently. P3 distributions suggest that EO and LO patients have differences concerning the contributions of frontal and parietal components of attentional networks to the execution of Go/No-go tasks. Our results imply that EO and LO are distinct subtypes affecting the cognitive control systems differently. (C) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectSosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler
dc.subjectKlinik Psikolojisi
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectPsikiyatri
dc.subjectTemel Bilimler (SCI)
dc.subjectPsikoloji
dc.subjectPSİKOLOJİ, KLİNİK
dc.titleN2 AND P3 POTENTIALS IN EARLY-ONSET AND LATE-ONSET PATIENTS WITH OBSESSIVE-COMPULSIVE DISORDER
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalDEPRESSION AND ANXIETY
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi , ,
dc.identifier.volume31
dc.identifier.issue12
dc.identifier.startpage997
dc.identifier.endpage1006
dc.contributor.firstauthorID20523


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record