Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKirbaslar, Sah Ismail
dc.contributor.authorUslu, Hasan
dc.contributor.authorHasret, Erdem
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-05T21:20:07Z
dc.date.available2021-03-05T21:20:07Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationHasret E., Kirbaslar S. I. , Uslu H., "Extraction of Citric Acid and Maleic Acid from Their Aqueous Solutions Using a Phosphorus-Bonded Extractant, Tri-&ITn&IT-octylphosphineoxide, and a Secondary Amine, Dioctylamine", JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING DATA, cilt.63, ss.39-48, 2018
dc.identifier.issn0021-9568
dc.identifier.otherav_d862542f-f5f0-4d59-bdf1-f0643e6e600c
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/142748
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jced.7b00562
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study is to investigate the extraction of citric acid and maleic acid from their aqueous solutions using different solvent-extractant mixtures in order to find the most effective composition for the extraction. Citric and maleic acids are chosen as the carboxylic acids due to their commercial worth in the industrial processes. Carboxylic acids are recovered from their aqueous solutions by reactive extraction, a promising liquid-liquid extraction technique, using trioctylphosphineoxide (TOPO), and a secondary amine called dioctylamine (DOA). TOPO has been chosen as an extractant since it has low water solubility, high stability, and it is more environmentally friendly than the amine-type extractants. For other amine extractants used in reactive extraction processes, there is a lack of study in the literature about the extraction of these acids with DOA. Extractants were dissolved in nine different solvents (butanol, decanol, octanol, isoamylalcohol, octane, decane, methylisobutylketone, and diisobutylketone) having different chemical structures. All experiments were carried out at 298.15 K. Comparisons of the results were made using, the distribution coefficient (D), loading factor (Z), and the extraction yield (%E). It has been observed that a considerable amount of citric acid and maleic acid extraction was achieved using DOA (in the range of 13.95-99.19% and 31.94-99.41% according to the diluent used for citric acid and maleic acid, respectively) compared to that achieved with TOPO (in the range of 0.81-67.12% and 16.25-89.33% according to the diluent used for citric acid and maleic acid, respectively).
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectBiyokimya
dc.subjectAlkoloidler
dc.subjectTemel Bilimler
dc.subjectMühendislik ve Teknoloji
dc.subjectMÜHENDİSLİK, KİMYASAL
dc.subjectKimya Mühendisliği ve Teknolojisi
dc.subjectTemel Bilimler (SCI)
dc.subjectKimya
dc.subjectKİMYA, MULTİDİSİPLİNER
dc.subjectMühendislik, Bilişim ve Teknoloji (ENG)
dc.subjectMühendislik
dc.subjectTERMODİNAMİK
dc.titleExtraction of Citric Acid and Maleic Acid from Their Aqueous Solutions Using a Phosphorus-Bonded Extractant, Tri-&ITn&IT-octylphosphineoxide, and a Secondary Amine, Dioctylamine
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF CHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING DATA
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi , ,
dc.identifier.volume63
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage39
dc.identifier.endpage48
dc.contributor.firstauthorID249788


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record