Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKUTLU, Safiye
dc.contributor.authorPurisa, SEVİM
dc.contributor.authorKÖŞLÜ, Adem
dc.contributor.authorEKMEKCI, Tugba Rezan
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-06T07:53:50Z
dc.date.available2021-03-06T07:53:50Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationKUTLU S., EKMEKCI T. R. , KÖŞLÜ A., Purisa S., "Complementary and Alternative Medicine Among Patients Attending to Dermatology Outpatient Clinic", TURKIYE KLINIKLERI TIP BILIMLERI DERGISI, cilt.29, ss.1496-1502, 2009
dc.identifier.issn1300-0292
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_de61ec2d-0410-4694-a4a4-470f9913fc8c
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/146522
dc.description.abstractObjective: To figure out the prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use, methods of CAM used, in which diseases CAM is preferred in patients attending the dermatology outpatient clinic and to evaluate patient views about this subject. Material and Methods: A total of 1000 patients attending the dermatology outpatient clinic for any skin disease were included randomly. Demographic data of the patients were questioned. Patients using CAM filled an inquiry questioning patient views. Results: One hundred and twenty-six patients (12.6%) used CAM. Young, single patients and patients with high education level preferred CAM more frequently than others did. The most common five diseases that CAM was used for were psoriasis, acne, alopecia, alopecia areata and verruca and the most common methods were herbal topical treatment (57.9%), spiritual healing (11.90%) and balneotherapy (10.3%). Fifty percent of the patients with psoriasis and 51.4% of the patients with alopecia areata employed CAM. The rate of using CAM in patients with psoriasis increased with the duration of the disease. Eighty-four (66.6%) patients applied CAM because they heard from their entourage that it was effective. Sixty-eight (53.9%) patients learned CAM from their entourage and other patients. Most of the patients applied this method by themselves (71.4%) and at their homes (76.1%). Sixty-six (52.3%) patients spent some money for CAM. Eighty-one (64.2%) patients through that the method was ineffective, 26 (20.6%) experienced side effects and 92 (73%) stated that they would not advise CAM. Eighty (63.4%) patients did not favor coverage of CAM costs by health insurance. Conclusion: CAM use was relatively low in our study. Among herbal therapies, such as homeopathy, aromatherapy, food and vitamin supplementation methods that are mostly used in other countries, only the first one was used in our country and the use of other three methods was not reported. Unlikely, spiritual healing and balneotberapy were more prominent.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectTemel Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectTIP, GENEL & İÇECEK
dc.titleComplementary and Alternative Medicine Among Patients Attending to Dermatology Outpatient Clinic
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalTURKIYE KLINIKLERI TIP BILIMLERI DERGISI
dc.contributor.departmentIstanbul Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training & Research Hospital , ,
dc.identifier.volume29
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.startpage1496
dc.identifier.endpage1502
dc.contributor.firstauthorID60552


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster