Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKaraca, Ali Erdogan
dc.contributor.authorDincer, Ibrahim
dc.contributor.authorQureshy, Ali M. M. I.
dc.contributor.authorAYDIN, Muhammed İberia
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-28T14:33:34Z
dc.date.available2021-02-28T14:33:34Z
dc.identifier.citationAYDIN M. İ. , Karaca A. E. , Qureshy A. M. M. I. , Dincer I., "A comparative review on clean hydrogen production from wastewaters", JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, cilt.279, 2021
dc.identifier.issn0301-4797
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_16210f74-f7ba-468d-9496-ebf2b4d3df37
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/1467
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111793
dc.description.abstractThis paper provides a unique review of hydrogen production methods with wastewater treatment to depict a clean and sustainable approach. Various methods for hydrogen production from wastewaters are identified and discussed with recent details by discussing the critical challenges, opportunities, and future directions. Five main performance sectors are considered in detail for each hydrogen production method of the recent case studies, including economic, environmental, social, technical, and reliability. Eight hydrogen production methods are reviewed, including anaerobic method, photo fermentation, dark fermentation, electrolysis, electrodialysis, photocatalysis, photoelectrochemical methods, and super water gasification. A comparative assessment of six reviewed methods for hydrogen production, including environmental, economic, energetic, and exergetic impacts, is evaluated. The comparative assessment results indicate that dark fermentation technology is the most economical method, and it is followed by microbial electrolysis and photofermentation. The most environmentally friendly method for the lowest global warming potential (GWP) is the microbial electrolysis method, and it is followed by photocatalysis and photoelectrochemical methods. Furthermore, the highest energy and exergy efficiencies have been recorded for the microbial electrolysis to be 68% and 64.7%, respectively.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectNature and Landscape Conservation
dc.subjectEnvironmental Science (miscellaneous)
dc.subjectPhysical Sciences
dc.subjectLife Sciences
dc.subjectMühendislik ve Teknoloji
dc.subjectAquatic Science
dc.subjectÇevre Mühendisliği
dc.subjectTarımsal Bilimler
dc.subjectTarım ve Çevre Bilimleri (AGE)
dc.subjectÇevre / Ekoloji
dc.subjectÇEVRE BİLİMLERİ
dc.titleA comparative review on clean hydrogen production from wastewaters
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi-Cerrahpaşa , Mühendislik Fakültesi , Çevre Mühendisliği Bölümü
dc.identifier.volume279
dc.contributor.firstauthorID2519161


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster