Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorErdilek, Dina
dc.contributor.authorYazicioglu, Oktay
dc.contributor.authorGomec, Yavuz
dc.contributor.authorDorter, Can
dc.contributor.authorEfes, Begum Guray
dc.contributor.authorYaman, Batu Can
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-06T08:33:53Z
dc.date.available2021-03-06T08:33:53Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationYaman B. C. , Efes B. G. , Dorter C., Gomec Y., Erdilek D., Yazicioglu O., "Microleakage of repaired class V silorane and nano-hybrid composite restorations after preparation with erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser and diamond bur", LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE, cilt.26, ss.163-170, 2011
dc.identifier.issn0268-8921
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_e190b04a-2980-4a94-8997-10053ecfafb4
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/148496
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-010-0755-3
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this in vitro study was to compare the microleakage of repaired class V resin composite restorations prepared either by Er:YAG laser or a diamond bur. Ninety-six intact human molar teeth were randomly distributed into eight groups. In the first four groups, class V cavities (3 x 3 x 3 mm) prepared on the buccal and lingual surfaces of the teeth using an erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser (VersaWave, HOYA ConBio, Japan). Similar class V cavities were prepared in the second four groups using a diamond bur (S-Class, Komet, UK). Teeth in groups 1, 2, and 5, 6 were restored with a nano-ceramic composite (Ceram.X duo, DENTSPLY), whereas a silorane material (Filtek Silorane, 3M ESPE) was used to restore cavities in groups 3, 4, and 7, 8. Two different adhesive systems (XP Bond, DENTSPLY, and Silorane System Adhesive, 3M ESPE) were also used. All specimens were aged for 7 days. New cavities (3 x 3 x 3 mm) were prepared adjacent to the old restorations with Er:YAG laser (groups I-IV) or diamond bur (groups V-VIII). Different repair materials were then applied to the new cavities using the previous two restorative materials and two adhesive systems. All teeth were subjected to thermocycling (5,000 cycles between 5 and 55A degrees C) and axial loadcycling (30 N, 1 Hz, 2,000 cycles). Specimens were immersed in 50% w/w silver nitrate solution. Teeth were sectioned longitudinally in buccolingual direction. Stereomicroscope (Nikon SMZ 800) and SEM (JEOL JSM 5600) were used to evaluate the microleakage that existed at the interface between the old restorations and the repair materials. Data were analyzed statistically with one-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (p 0.05). No microleakage scores were obtained in the groups repaired with Filtek Silorane/Filtek Silorane and Ceram.X/Ceram.X. All the substances tested can be used as repair materials for immediate repair after Er:YAG laser and diamond bur. All substances tested in this study can be used as immediate repair materials after cavity preparations with Er:YAG laser or diamond bur.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectCerrahi Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectBiyomedikal Mühendisliği
dc.subjectMühendislik ve Teknoloji
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectCERRAHİ
dc.subjectMühendislik, Bilişim ve Teknoloji (ENG)
dc.subjectMühendislik
dc.subjectMÜHENDİSLİK, BİYOMEDİKSEL
dc.titleMicroleakage of repaired class V silorane and nano-hybrid composite restorations after preparation with erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser and diamond bur
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalLASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi , ,
dc.identifier.volume26
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.startpage163
dc.identifier.endpage170
dc.contributor.firstauthorID30845


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record