Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGüzel, G.İ.
dc.contributor.authorMeral, Rasim
dc.contributor.authorGüveli, Murat
dc.contributor.authorAltun, Musa
dc.contributor.authorBektaş Kayhan, Kıvanç
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-06T08:46:06Z
dc.date.available2021-03-06T08:46:06Z
dc.identifier.citationBektaş Kayhan K., Güzel G., Güveli M., Altun M., Meral R., "Oral cancer in young people: 10 years retrospective", 13th Biennial Congress of the European Association of Oral Medicine, Turin, İtalya, 15 - 17 Eylül 2016, cilt.22, no.29, ss.48
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_e2862238-4dd6-4a7d-a19c-9a5b3d3340bf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/149101
dc.description.abstractOral cancer in young people: 10 years retrospectiveObjectives:Oral cancer is the sixth most common of cancers worldwide. In last two dec-ades there were many reports emerging about young people having oral cancer, which isknown as having a peak during the sixth decades. In this study we aimed to evaluate theyoung people having oral cancer about etiologic factors.Methods:The data was retrospectively collected from the archives at Istanbul University,Oncology Institute, Radiation Oncology Department. 51 patients (19 female, 32 male)who were treated for oral cancer between years 2005-2015 and aged between 18 and 45were reviewed.Statistical data was evaluated with IBM 22.0 programme and statistical significance wastaken as P<0.05.Results:The most common location was the tongue 27.5% followed by the hard palate15.7% and the base of tongue 13.7%. In terms of etiologic factors smoking, alcohol, fam-ily history of cancer were investigated. Smoking was found significantly higher in males(P=0.0001) but not statistically significant between age groups. Alcohol consumptionwas also found significantly higher in males (P=0.003) but not significant between agegroups. Family history of cancer results were similar between groups. Nodal metastasisresults between age groups found statistically significant.Higher aged group had more nodal metastasis (P=0.05). Histologic grading was alsofound statistically significant in comparison of age groups. The higher aged group hadmore poor differentiation than younger aged group (P=0.032).Conclusion:The risk factors we evaluated in this study have similar results with higherage groups. In the limitations of this study we could not compare HPV infection anddietary factors. However further investigations in larger groups, possibly prospectivelyconducted, could shed more light on risk factors of younger people having oral cancer. Relevance:Major avoidable risk factors for oral cancer seems to be similar whicheverage group we concern. More efforts both by clinicians and governments are needed, espe-cially to prevent the use of tobacco products.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectKlinik Bilimler
dc.subjectAğız, Diş-Çene Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi
dc.subjectAğız Diş Çene Cerrahisi
dc.subjectOrthodontics
dc.subjectOral Surgery
dc.subjectDentistry (miscellaneous)
dc.subjectDental Hygiene
dc.subjectPeriodontics
dc.subjectDental Assisting
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectHealth Sciences
dc.subjectGeneral Dentistry
dc.subjectDiş Hekimliği
dc.subjectDİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ, ORAL CERRAHİ VE TIP
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.titleOral cancer in young people: 10 years retrospective
dc.typeBildiri
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi , Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi , Klinik Bilimler Bölümü
dc.identifier.volume22
dc.contributor.firstauthorID2504986


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record