Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKazancioglu, Hakki Oguz
dc.contributor.authorErisen, Merve
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-06T12:57:04Z
dc.date.available2021-03-06T12:57:04Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationKazancioglu H. O. , Erisen M., "Comparison of Low-Level Laser Therapy versus Ozone Therapy in the Treatment of Oral Lichen Planus", ANNALS OF DERMATOLOGY, cilt.27, ss.485-491, 2015
dc.identifier.issn1013-9087
dc.identifier.otherav_f65bdc58-4fdb-43f6-b29e-7a3cb0def422
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/161404
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5021/ad.2015.27.5.485
dc.description.abstractBackground: The treatment options for oral lichen planus (OLP) are numerous and include topical and systemic agents. Intralesional and systemic corticosteroids are used; however, the therapeutic results are often disappointing. Objective: To compare the influence of ozone, laser, and topical corticosteroid therapies in the treatment of OLP. Methods: One hundred twenty adult patients with 53 cm atrophic-erosive biopsy-proven OLPs in the tongue or buccal mucosa were recruited into the study. They were randomly assigned, by preoperative envelope drawing, to be treated with low-level laser therapy (LLLT group), ozone therapy (ozonated group), and topical corticosteroid therapy (positive control group). A placebo treatment containing base ointment without the active corticosteroid component was administered to patients in the negative control group. Response rate scores were determined on the basis of changes in the appearance score and pain score of the lesions between baseline and after each treatment. Results: The study subjects consisted of 56 male and 64 female OLP patients with a combined mean age of 42.6+/-8.3 years (range, 28 similar to 55 years). No statistically significant difference was detected in clinical severity among the groups. The sign scores decreased in almost all scoring groups; however, statistically significant improvement was found in the ozonated and corticosteroid-treated groups. Symptom improvement was achieved after treatment with LLLT, ozone, and corticosteroid (p<0.05). The efficacy indices were significantly higher in the ozonated and corticosteroid-treated groups. Conclusion: Ozone and corticosteroid therapies were more effective than 808-nm LLLT in the treatment of OLP.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectDermatoloji
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectDERMATOLOJİ
dc.titleComparison of Low-Level Laser Therapy versus Ozone Therapy in the Treatment of Oral Lichen Planus
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalANNALS OF DERMATOLOGY
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi , ,
dc.identifier.volume27
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.startpage485
dc.identifier.endpage491
dc.contributor.firstauthorID225054


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record