Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorBozkurt, Omer Faruk
dc.contributor.authorSarikaya, Selcuk
dc.contributor.authorEbiloglu, Turgay
dc.contributor.authorSelvi, İsmail
dc.contributor.authorSenocak, Cogri
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-10T09:39:23Z
dc.date.available2021-12-10T09:39:23Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationSarikaya S., Ebiloglu T., Selvi İ., Senocak C., Bozkurt O. F. , "RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY OR PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY: WHICH ONE IS MORE EFFECTIVE FOR 1-2 CM RENAL STONES IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS?", ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, cilt.72, sa.1, ss.54-60, 2019
dc.identifier.issn0004-0614
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_09f167ed-d188-4dab-bfba-1c6ea7e6b967
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/168183
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: Urinary stone disease is less common in pediatric age group and it has an increasing incidence. In this study, our hypothesis is to evaluate if one of the techniques, PNL or RIRS is superior than the other in terms of stone free status (SFR), fluoroscopy time (FT), operation time (OT), complication rate (CR), JJ stent insertion rate, and hospitalization duration (HD) in children.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectNefroloji
dc.subjectNephrology
dc.subjectUrology
dc.subjectHealth Sciences
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectİç Hastalıkları
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectÜROLOJİ VE NEFROLOJİ
dc.titleRETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY OR PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY: WHICH ONE IS MORE EFFECTIVE FOR 1-2 CM RENAL STONES IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS?
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA
dc.contributor.departmentGulhane Training & Research Hospital , ,
dc.identifier.volume72
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage54
dc.identifier.endpage60
dc.contributor.firstauthorID2696735


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster