Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorAltinpulluk, Ece Yamak
dc.contributor.authorTURGUT, MEHMET
dc.contributor.authorAsar, Sinan
dc.contributor.authorSari, Sinem
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-10T09:51:21Z
dc.date.available2021-12-10T09:51:21Z
dc.identifier.citationAsar S., Sari S., Altinpulluk E. Y. , TURGUT M., "Efficacy of erector spinae plane block on postoperative pain in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery", EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2021
dc.identifier.issn0940-6719
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_179fd316-1290-4d00-b0fb-38b8c3b30df2
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/168638
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-07056-z
dc.description.abstractBackground Major lumbar spine surgery causes severe pain in the postoperative period. There are few studies regarding the effect of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) effect on lumbar surgery and its effect is still controversial. Therefore, the study aimed to investigate the effect of ultrasound-guided low thoracic ESPB on opioid consumption and postoperative pain score. Material and methods Seventy-eight patients undergoing elective open lumbar spine surgery were randomized into two groups. In ESPB group (n = 35) received ultrasound-guided ESPB and in the control group (n = 35), there was no block. Postoperative opioid consumption as morphine equivalent dose, numerical rating scale, mobilization time, discharge time and side effects, bolus deliveries, rescue analgesia doses were evaluated. Results Total opioid consumption as morphine equivalent was higher in the control group than the ESPB group (p = 0.000). Compare with the control group, the numeric rating scale scores were lower in the ESPB group at the 6th, 12th, and 24th hours (p < 0.05). The patient-controlled analgesia button pressing number in the postoperative 24-h period was lower in the ESPB group (p = 0.000). In the postoperative 24-h period, the need for paracetamol in the ESPB group was lower and the difference between the groups was statistically significant (p = 0.008). Rescue analgesia (diclofenac) doses were higher in the control group (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in terms of side effects and mobilization times. Conclusion ESPB is adequate for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery and can reduce opioid consumption compared with standard analgesia.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectNöroloji
dc.subjectCerrahi Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectOrtopedi ve Travmatoloji
dc.subjectNeurology
dc.subjectNeurology (clinical)
dc.subjectOrthopedics and Sports Medicine
dc.subjectPodiatry
dc.subjectLife Sciences
dc.subjectHealth Sciences
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectORTOPEDİ
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectKLİNİK NEUROLOJİ
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectTıp
dc.titleEfficacy of erector spinae plane block on postoperative pain in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalEUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
dc.contributor.departmentAydın Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi , ,
dc.contributor.firstauthorID2770848


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster