Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorÖZKAN, Ulaş Yunus
dc.contributor.authorDEMİREL, Tufan
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-10T10:00:53Z
dc.date.available2021-12-10T10:00:53Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationÖZKAN U. Y. , DEMİREL T., "The influence of window size on remote sensing-based prediction of forest structural variables", ECOLOGICAL PROCESSES, cilt.10, sa.1, 2021
dc.identifier.issn2192-1709
dc.identifier.otherav_224d6262-8dbf-4097-88bc-406b9e3b2216
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/168990
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-021-00330-4
dc.description.abstractBackground Determining the appropriate window size is a critical step in the estimation process of stand structural variables based on remote sensing data. Because the value of the reference laser and image metrics that affect the quality of the prediction model depends on window size. However, suitable window sizes are usually determined by trial and error. There are a limited number of published studies evaluating appropriate window sizes for different remote sensing data. This research investigated the effect of window size on predicting forest structural variables using airborne LiDAR data, digital aerial image and WorldView-3 satellite image. Results In the WorldView-3 and digital aerial image, significant differences were observed in the prediction accuracies of the structural variables according to different window sizes. For the estimation based on WorldView-3 in black pine stands, the optimal window sizes for stem number (N), volume (V), basal area (BA) and mean height (H) were determined as 1000 m(2), 100 m(2), 100 m(2) and 600 m(2), respectively. In oak stands, the R-2 values of each moving window size were almost identical for N and BA. The optimal window size was 400 m(2) for V and 600 m(2) for H. For the estimation based on aerial image in black pine stands, the 800 m(2) window size was optimal for N and H, the 600 m(2) window size was optimal for V and the 1000 m(2) window size was optimal for BA. In the oak stands, the optimal window sizes for N, V, BA and H were determined as 1000 m(2), 100 m(2), 100 m(2) and 600 m(2), respectively. The optimal window sizes may need to be scaled up or down to match the stand canopy components. In the LiDAR data, the R-2 values of each window size were almost identical for all variables of the black pine and the oak stands. Conclusion This study illustrated that the window size has an effect on the prediction accuracy in estimating forest structural variables based on remote sensing data. Moreover, the results showed that the optimal window size for forest structural variables varies according to remote sensing data and tree species composition.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectPhysical Sciences
dc.subjectEKOLOJİ
dc.subjectÇevre / Ekoloji
dc.subjectTarım ve Çevre Bilimleri (AGE)
dc.subjectLife Sciences
dc.subjectMühendislik ve Teknoloji
dc.subjectAquatic Science
dc.subjectEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
dc.subjectEcology
dc.subjectNature and Landscape Conservation
dc.subjectEcological Modeling
dc.subjectEnvironmental Science (miscellaneous)
dc.subjectÇEVRE BİLİMLERİ
dc.subjectTarımsal Bilimler
dc.subjectÇevre Mühendisliği
dc.subjectÇevre Teknolojisi
dc.subjectEkoloji ve Kirlenme
dc.titleThe influence of window size on remote sensing-based prediction of forest structural variables
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalECOLOGICAL PROCESSES
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi-Cerrahpaşa , Orman Fakültesi , Orman Mühendisliği
dc.identifier.volume10
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.contributor.firstauthorID2735753


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster