Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorSonmez, Mesut
dc.contributor.authorOzdes, Taskin
dc.contributor.authorEsenyel, Meltem
dc.contributor.authorKahraman, Sinan
dc.contributor.authorSenel, Berna
dc.contributor.authorEsenyel, Cem
dc.contributor.authorDemirhan, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-02T23:12:31Z
dc.date.available2021-03-02T23:12:31Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.citationEsenyel C., Demirhan M., Esenyel M., Sonmez M., Kahraman S., Senel B., Ozdes T., "Comparison of four different intra-articular injection sites in the knee: a cadaver study", KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, cilt.15, sa.5, ss.573-577, 2007
dc.identifier.issn0942-2056
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_11119538-b47d-4370-aa76-8f8fc320cd86
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/16971
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-006-0231-6
dc.description.abstractAlthough intra-articular knee injection is not a complicated procedure, it could be difficult to assess whether the tip of the needle lies free in the joint or is embedded in synovium or other intra-articular soft tissues. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy rate of intra-articular injection using anteromedial (AM), anterolateral (AL), lateral midpatellar (LMP), and medial midpatellar (MMP) portals in cadavers. In this study 156 knees of 78 fresh cadavers were included. Anterolateral and AM injection to both knees of 39 cadavers (78 knees) were performed. MMP and LMP injection to both knees of other 39 cadavers were also performed. Accuracy rate was the highest (85%) in the AL injection portal and lowest in the MMP portal (56%). In conclusion, the accuracy obtained with use of the MMP portal was significantly lower than that obtained with the use of either the AM (P < 0.05), AL (P < 0.0001), or LMP (P < 0.05) portal. Although AL injection site resulted in good intra-articular delivery with 85% accuracy rate and with a lower incidence of soft tissue infiltration, the results were not statistically significant when compared to AM and LMP portals. Therefore, any of these three portals might be preferred depending on the experience of the physician. On the other hand, 100% accuracy could not be obtained through any portals in the study, which should be kept in mind when treating knee problems with intra-articular medications.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectCerrahi Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectOrtopedi ve Travmatoloji
dc.subjectSosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler
dc.subjectSosyoloji
dc.subjectSosyal Bilimler Genel
dc.subjectSosyal Bilimler (SOC)
dc.subjectCERRAHİ
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectSPOR BİLİMLERİ
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectORTOPEDİ
dc.titleComparison of four different intra-articular injection sites in the knee: a cadaver study
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalKNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY
dc.contributor.department, ,
dc.identifier.volume15
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.startpage573
dc.identifier.endpage577
dc.contributor.firstauthorID182666


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster