Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAkyüz, Ali
dc.contributor.authorDoğan, Varlık
dc.contributor.authorBalık, Emre
dc.contributor.authorBulut, Mehmet Türker
dc.contributor.authorKarataş, Irem
dc.contributor.authorKeskin, Metin
dc.contributor.authorÖzgür, Ilker
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-10T11:28:49Z
dc.date.available2021-12-10T11:28:49Z
dc.identifier.citationÖzgür I., Doğan V., Karataş I., Keskin M., Balık E., Bulut M. T. , Akyüz A., "Could caudal bloc become a solution for anismus?", ESCP Vienna 2019, 14th Scientific and Annual Meeting, 25-27 September 2019 Vienna, Austria, Vienna, Avusturya, 25 - 27 Eylül 2019, cilt.21, sa.3, ss.33-128
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_80461b66-f349-4d5a-9ad6-da720d7f0229
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/171970
dc.identifier.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/codi.14775
dc.description.abstractAim: To evaluate caudal bloc treatment for animus patients.Method: 37 consecutive patients diagnosed as anismus between January 2014 and January 2019 were included. Demographic data, symptomatic reversal rate at the 6th month and 1st year, and quality of life questionnaire results were evaluated retrospectively.Results: Mean age was 41.9 years. Of 37 patients, 24.3% (n = 9) were male and 75.7% (n = 28) were female. All of the patients complained of prolonged constipation, straining during defecation and incomplete emptying of rectum during defecation. Ten patients defecated with enema, while 8 could only perform hand assisted defecation. Median follow up period was 873 days. After caudal bloc, 19 (51.3%) patients at the 6th month and 12 (32.4%) patients at the 1st year had symptomatic reversal. Seven patients consuming laxatives and 4 using enema quit. Three patients were able to defecate without hand assistance. A health quality questionnaire revealed no difference except pain between patients who benefited or not from the procedure.Conclusion: Almost half of the patients benefited from caudal block in the short term. Nevertheless, the effect of the procedure decreases over time. Caudal block may become a temporary solution for anismus. Also, quality of life seems not to be affected, except pain.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectCerrahi Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectGenel Cerrahi
dc.subjectProktoloji
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.subjectHealth Sciences
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectCERRAHİ
dc.titleCould caudal bloc become a solution for anismus?
dc.typeBildiri
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi , İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi , Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü
dc.identifier.volume21
dc.contributor.firstauthorID2692723


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record