Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorGuenes Durak, Sevgi
dc.contributor.authorTÜFEKCİ, Neşe
dc.contributor.authorAkarcay Demir, Sultan
dc.contributor.authorÇETİN, Ender
dc.contributor.authorCelik, Suna Oezden
dc.contributor.authorAcarer, Seren
dc.contributor.authorTuefekci, Nese
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-10T11:33:34Z
dc.date.available2021-12-10T11:33:34Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationTÜFEKCİ N., Celik S. O. , Guenes Durak S., Acarer S., ÇETİN E., Akarcay Demir S., Tuefekci N., "Effects of Fe(OH)(3) and MnO2 Flocs on Iron/Manganese Removal and Fouling in Aerated Submerged Membrane Systems", POLYMERS, cilt.13, sa.19, 2021
dc.identifier.issn2073-4360
dc.identifier.otherav_85dba9a4-8d68-41e9-92c6-c325c974d055
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/172145
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/polym13193201
dc.description.abstractMany treatment methods are used to remove iron and manganese from water. Aeration and membrane filtration are two of these methods. In this study, Fe2+ and Mn2+ removal by aeration with different catalysts and instead of simple membrane filtration applied in other studies, the aerated-submerged membrane systems were evaluated separately. When Fe(OH)(3) was applied in the aeration step and complete oxidation of Fe2+ was obtained after 27 min, while complete Mn2+ oxidation was obtained in 76 min. However, when MnO2 was applied in the aeration step, complete oxidation of Fe2+ and Mn2+ was relatively slow (36 and 110 min, respectively). According to the results obtained from the aerated membrane system, Fe2+ and Mn2+ removal were extended by Fe(OH)(3) via adsorption/surface oxidation. It is clearly shown from the flux, resistance results, scanning electron microscope (SEM) and Fourier transform infrared (FT/IR) spectroscopy observation that manganese oxides were deposited mainly in membrane pores forming membrane fouling by small flocs, while iron oxide particles were deposited on the membrane surface. Although the flux performance of PT PES membrane was higher than HF PP membrane, fouling resistance of HF PP membrane was higher than PT PES.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectTemel Bilimler (SCI)
dc.subjectPOLİMER BİLİMİ
dc.subjectKimya
dc.subjectFizikokimya
dc.subjectPolimer Karakterizasyonu
dc.subjectTemel Bilimler
dc.subjectPolymers and Plastics
dc.subjectChemistry (miscellaneous)
dc.subjectGeneral Chemistry
dc.subjectPhysical Sciences
dc.titleEffects of Fe(OH)(3) and MnO2 Flocs on Iron/Manganese Removal and Fouling in Aerated Submerged Membrane Systems
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalPOLYMERS
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi-Cerrahpaşa , Mühendislik Fakültesi , Çevre Mühendisliği Bölümü
dc.identifier.volume13
dc.identifier.issue19
dc.contributor.firstauthorID2755870


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster