Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorÇınar, Çiğdem
dc.contributor.authorŞentürk Çiftçi, Hayriye
dc.contributor.authorOğuz, Fatma
dc.contributor.authorKıvanç, Demet
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-10T11:58:56Z
dc.date.available2021-12-10T11:58:56Z
dc.identifier.citationKıvanç D., Şentürk Çiftçi H., Çınar Ç., Oğuz F., "Comparison of the results of PRA identification and Single antijen Bead assay in patients with Kidney Transplant Candidate. ", 6th European Congress of Immunology , 1 - 04 Eylül 2021, ss.343
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_a0b1c3a7-2a72-403a-a960-4277b31977ba
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/173007
dc.description.abstractWe aimed to compare the results of Single Antigen Bead (SAB) and Panel reactive antibody (PRA) class‐I‐II identification of the end‐stage renal disease patients. We retrospectively analyzed 256 patients (female/male,152/104) who were tested for anti‐HLA antibodies the years between 2017 and 2020. PRA identification and SAB tests were performed by using an Luminex method (immucor). Patients were classified as positive for PRA (MFI≥1000) (78%) and positive for SAB (37.2%) according to anti HLA antibodies. 39.6% of patients with PRA (+) and 33.3% of patients with SAB (+) had ‘’Donor Spesific Antibody’’(DSA). Anti‐HLA antibodies of the patients who had DSA with high MFI were as follows: A1 (16913), A2 (15715), B50 (9207), B51 (6000), DR15 (20000), DR16 (16350), DQ7 (22700), DQ2 (22400). Of the PRA (+) patients, 20% were only class‐I (+); 40% were only class‐II (+); 40% were both class‐I‐II (+). PRA (+) patients were divided into 4 groups according to their MFI values as follows: Group‐1: MFI <1000, Group‐2: MFI:1000‐3000, Group‐3: MFI:3000‐5000, Group‐4: MFI>5000. Class‐I‐SAB was performed in 106 of patients with PRA‐class‐I (+). Class‐I‐SAB was positive in 80%, 83%, 100% and 98% of patients in groups respectively. Class‐II‐SAB was performed in 160 of the PRA‐class‐II (+) patients. Class‐II‐SAB was positive in 57,1%, 54,5%, 77,7% and 89% of patients in groups respectively. Our results indicated that the PRA‐class‐I MFI values above 3000 were associated with Class‐I‐SAB positivity (p:0,049) and PRA‐class‐II MFI values above 5000 were associated with Class‐II‐SAB positivity (p:0,0001).
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectBİYOLOJİ
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectTemel Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectTıbbi Biyoloji
dc.subjectFamily Practice
dc.subjectFundamentals and Skills
dc.subjectGeneral Health Professions
dc.subjectPathophysiology
dc.subjectInternal Medicine
dc.subjectBiyoloji ve Biyokimya
dc.subjectMedicine (miscellaneous)
dc.subjectGeneral Medicine
dc.subjectHealth Sciences
dc.subjectAssessment and Diagnosis
dc.subjectTIP, GENEL & İÇECEK
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectYaşam Bilimleri (LIFE)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.titleComparison of the results of PRA identification and Single antijen Bead assay in patients with Kidney Transplant Candidate.
dc.typeBildiri
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi , İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi , Temel Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü
dc.contributor.firstauthorID2720777


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record