Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorOzturk, Savas
dc.contributor.authorCorum, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorKaracan, Ilhan
dc.contributor.authorOren, Meryem Merve
dc.contributor.authorBahat, Gulistan
dc.contributor.authorAydin, Tugba
dc.contributor.authorKesiktas, Fatma Nur
dc.contributor.authorErdogan, Tugba
dc.contributor.authorAhisha, Yigit Can
dc.contributor.authorKizilkurt, Taha
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-10T12:36:26Z
dc.date.available2021-12-10T12:36:26Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationAydin T., Kesiktas F. N. , Oren M. M. , Erdogan T., Ahisha Y. C. , Kizilkurt T., Corum M., Karacan I., Ozturk S., Bahat G., "Sarcopenia in patients following stroke: an overlooked problem", INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, cilt.44, sa.3, ss.269-275, 2021
dc.identifier.issn0342-5282
dc.identifier.otherav_c830bba2-f095-48c7-9b7a-6a1c50e82ede
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/174221
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/mrr.0000000000000487
dc.description.abstractOur aim was to investigate the prevalence of sarcopenia in stroke patients, the relationship between sarcopenia detected with different low muscle mass (LMM) adjustment methods, and between stroke-related parameters. Eighty-one patients with chronic stroke who underwent inpatient rehabilitation were included. Spasticity was evaluated by modified Ashworth scale, Brunnstrom staging approach was used for motor function evaluation, physical independence was evaluated using Barthel Index, quality-of-life was evaluated by EQ-5D-3L, and the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale was used to measure multimorbidity. Muscle strength was evaluated by handgrip strength, muscle quantity through a bioelectric impedance analysis, and physical performance by gait speed and short physical performance battery. LMM was calculated through two different methods: Skeletal muscle mass (SMM)/height(2), and SMM/BMI. For the definition of sarcopenia, we followed the EWGSOP2 recommendation. Associated sarcopenia factors were predicted by multivariate binary logistic regression analysis. The prevalence of probable sarcopenia was 32.1%. The prevalence of confirmed/sarcopenia when LMM was adjusted for BMI was higher than when adjusted for height(2) (16 and 1.2%, respectively). Age was significantly higher in those with probable sarcopenia (P = 0.006). Stroke duration was shorter in those with probable or confirmed sarcopenia (P = 0.004, P < 0.001, respectively). EQ-5D-3L scores were significantly lower in those with confirmed sarcopenia (P = 0.050). The strongest associated factor with confirmed sarcopenia was stroke duration (OR: 0.77; 95% CI, 0.618-0.965). This study suggests that prevalence of sarcopenia after a stroke is significantly high. LMM adjusted for BMI comes in front as the adjustment method for LMM after a stroke.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectRehabilitation
dc.subjectPhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
dc.subjectHealth Sciences
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectREHABİLİTASYON
dc.subjectChiropractics
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectFiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.titleSarcopenia in patients following stroke: an overlooked problem
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi , İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi , Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü
dc.identifier.volume44
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.startpage269
dc.identifier.endpage275
dc.contributor.firstauthorID2707379


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster