Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorSager, Sait
dc.contributor.authorSayman, Haluk Burcak
dc.contributor.authorPehlivanoglu, Huseyin
dc.contributor.authorKabasakal, Levent
dc.contributor.authorOcak, Meltem
dc.contributor.authorAsa, Sertaç
dc.contributor.authorSönmezoğlu, Kerim
dc.contributor.authorUslu-Besli, Lebriz
dc.contributor.authorSahin, Onur Erdem
dc.contributor.authorKarayel, Emre
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-10T13:04:14Z
dc.date.available2021-12-10T13:04:14Z
dc.identifier.citationAsa S., Sönmezoğlu K., Uslu-Besli L., Sahin O. E. , Karayel E., Pehlivanoglu H., Sager S., Kabasakal L., Ocak M., Sayman H. B. , "Evaluation of F-18 DOPA PET/CT in the detection of recurrent or metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma: comparison with GA-68 DOTA-TATE PET/CT", ANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, cilt.35, ss.900-915, 2021
dc.identifier.issn0914-7187
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_ec1b9623-7fe9-417c-a317-ce7575740aa4
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/175339
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-021-01627-2
dc.description.abstractObjective PET imaging with F-18 DOPA (FDOPA) and Ga-68 DOTATATE (TATE) shows the most promising results to detect medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) recurrence. We performed this comparative study to detect the site of recurrent or metastatic disease in MTC patients with elevated serum calcitonin (Ctn) and/or carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels. Methods We studied 46 MTC patients (25 women, 21 men) with elevated Ctn and/or CEA levels during follow-up who had both FDOPA and TATE PET/CT scans for re-staging purposes. Results FDOPA PET imaging yielded an overall sensitivity of 86.8%, specificity of 100%, PPV of 100%, NPV of 61.5%, and accuracy of 89.1%, while TATE PET scan had the same values as 84.2%, 87.5%, 96.9%, 53.8%, and 84.6%, respectively, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two modalities with the exception of the specificity value that was higher for FDOPA imaging. In a subgroup of patients with overt Ctn or CEA elevation, sensitivity of FDOPA increased significantly, whereas TATE sensitivity did not change. FDOPA PET imaging was significantly superior in detecting liver and regional lymph node (LN) metastases, while TATE PET scan was significantly better in the skeletal metastases. Early FDOPA demonstrated 11 invisible lesions on late FDOPA. Conclusion Both FDOPA and TATE PET/CT imaging are useful to localize recurrences in MTC patients. While TATE imaging is superior to reveal skeletal disease, FDOPA seems better in liver and regional LN metastases; therefore, the two modalities appear complementary in monitoring MTC patients with elevated serum Ctn and/or CEA levels.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
dc.subjectRadiological and Ultrasound Technology
dc.subjectHealth Sciences
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectNükleer Tıp
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectRADYOLOJİ, NÜKLEER TIP ve MEDİKAL GÖRÜNTÜLEME
dc.titleEvaluation of F-18 DOPA PET/CT in the detection of recurrent or metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma: comparison with GA-68 DOTA-TATE PET/CT
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi-Cerrahpaşa , Cerrahpaşa Tıp Fakültesi , Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü
dc.identifier.volume35
dc.identifier.startpage900
dc.identifier.endpage915
dc.contributor.firstauthorID2741015


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster