Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAkan, Taner
dc.contributor.authorGündüz, Halil İbrahim
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-18T09:03:58Z
dc.date.available2022-02-18T09:03:58Z
dc.identifier.citationAkan T., Gündüz H. İ. , "Why are Some Countries Cleaner than Others? New Theoretical and Empirical Evidence from Macroeconomics", Diğer, ss.1-38, 2021
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_15636f10-76da-4a70-bff5-7ae5950515dd
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/176439
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.researchgate.net/profile/Tara-Vanli/publication/351112748_Why_are_Some_Countries_Cleaner_than_Others_New_Theoretical_and_Empirical_Evidence_from_Macroeconomics/links/608829362fb9097c0c12feec/Why-are-Some-Countries-Cleaner-than-Others-New-Theoretical-and-Empirical-Evidence-from-Macroeconomics.pdf
dc.description.abstractIt has been established that environmental pollution is a key driver of COVID-19 and other looming pandemics, further boosting a full-fledged transformation into a green economic system. This study aims to investigate why some countries are cleaner than the others with reference to macroeconomic governance (MEG) in order to explain how major macroeconomic aggregates should be governed to mitigate environmental pollution at the level of economic systems. Using per capita carbon dioxide emissions (CPC) as the proxy for environmental pollution, and macro non-financial governance (MNFG) and macro financial governance (MFG) as the proxies for MEG, the study introduces green complementarities (GCMs) and dirty complementarities (DCMs) as analytic concepts to compare the MEG models for managing pollution in 13 high-income countries (HICs), 10 upper-middle-income countries (UMICs), and nine lower-middleincome countries (LMICs) for the period 1994–2014. It hypothesizes that systemic and fragmented governance of GCMs and DCMs are, inter alia, the key drivers of the countries’ pollution levels, and uses the Panel ARDL Pooled Mean Group estimator to conduct the empirical analysis. The paper concludes that (i) HICs reduced their CPC levels thanks to adopting green systemic governance by creating GCMs between both MNFG and MFG variables in the long-run; (ii) UMICs experienced a remarkable increase in their CPC levels due to adopting dirty systemic governance by creating DCMs between the MNFG variables, but prevented pollution from being higher through creating GCMs between the MFG variables; and (iii) LMICs experienced the highest comparative increase in CPC due to adopting a fragmented governance in managing both MNFG-pollution and MFG-pollution nexus.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectİktisat
dc.subjectBilim, Teknoloji ve Toplum
dc.subjectBilim ve Teknoloji Politikası Çalışmaları
dc.subjectEkonometri
dc.subjectEconomics and Econometrics
dc.subjectPolitical Science and International Relations
dc.subjectEconomics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
dc.subjectGeneral Economics, Econometrics and Finance
dc.subjectPOLİTİKA BİLİMİ
dc.subjectSocial Sciences & Humanities
dc.subjectSosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler
dc.subjectEKONOMİ
dc.subjectSosyal Bilimler Genel
dc.subjectEkonomi ve İş
dc.subjectSosyal Bilimler (SOC)
dc.titleWhy are Some Countries Cleaner than Others? New Theoretical and Empirical Evidence from Macroeconomics
dc.typeDiğer Yayınlar
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi , İktisat Fakültesi , İktisat Bölümü
dc.contributor.firstauthorID3051704


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record