Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorŞEN, Cengiz
dc.contributor.authorKELEŞTEMUR, MEHMET HALİDUN
dc.contributor.authorGÜNEŞ, TANER
dc.contributor.authorBostan, Bora
dc.contributor.authorErdem, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorAŞCI, MURAT
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-18T09:06:30Z
dc.date.available2022-02-18T09:06:30Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationGÜNEŞ T., Bostan B., Erdem M., AŞCI M., ŞEN C., KELEŞTEMUR M. H. , "Biomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic all-inside meniscus repairs", KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, cilt.17, sa.11, ss.1347-1353, 2009
dc.identifier.issn0942-2056
dc.identifier.otherav_19f31a30-6f2e-47a0-b8a3-fde79fe8c1dd
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/176533
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-009-0871-4
dc.description.abstractViper is a new device for arthroscopically all-inside meniscal repairing. In previous studies about Viper device, procedures were not applied arthroscopically despite this device has been designed for arthroscopic application. In this study, we evaluated primary fixation strength of arthroscopically applied meniscal repair using Viper device to obtain better clinical relevance. Two centimeter in length meniscal tear 2-3 mm far from periferic edge of medial meniscus of 50 calves were created arthroscopically. The menisci were divided into five groups including 10 menisci in each. In group 1, tears were repaired by outside-in vertical loop suture technique with No: 0 PDS. Tears were fixed by all-inside vertical suture by using Viper device with No: 0 PDS in group 2. In meniscal implant groups, RapidLoc, H-Fix, and Clearfix were applied in groups 3,4, and 5, respectively. Primary fixation strength of repairing techniques were evaluated with bio-mechanical testing machine. Fixation strengths determined in groups 1 and 2 were detected as 145 +/- A 13 and 136 +/- A 33 N, respectively. There was no difference in pull-out strength between groups 1 and 2. Fixation strengths in these two groups were significantly higher compared to groups 3, 4, and 5. There was no significant difference between group 3 (33 +/- A 6 N) and 5 (28 +/- A 6 N) in terms of fixation strengths whereas fixation strengths of these two groups were significantly higher compared to group 4 (20 +/- A 3 N) (P = 0.005, P = 0.018, respectively). All-inside vertical suture technique using Viper device revealed comparable primary fixation strength with outside-in vertical suture technique for meniscal repair. We suggest that the Viper device is safe and reliable for meniscal repair.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.subjectORTOPEDİ
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectSPOR BİLİMLERİ
dc.subjectSosyal Bilimler Genel
dc.subjectSosyal Bilimler (SOC)
dc.subjectCERRAHİ
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectCerrahi Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectOrtopedi ve Travmatoloji
dc.subjectSosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler
dc.subjectPodiatry
dc.subjectSocial Sciences & Humanities
dc.subjectHealth Sciences
dc.subjectSosyoloji
dc.subjectGeneral Social Sciences
dc.subjectOrthopedics and Sports Medicine
dc.titleBiomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic all-inside meniscus repairs
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalKNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY
dc.contributor.departmentTokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi , ,
dc.identifier.volume17
dc.identifier.issue11
dc.identifier.startpage1347
dc.identifier.endpage1353
dc.contributor.firstauthorID3377194


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record