Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPehlivan, Mikail
dc.contributor.authorSUSAM, Nazan
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-04T13:45:07Z
dc.date.available2022-07-04T13:45:07Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationPehlivan M., SUSAM N., "Transformation of Water Services: Lessons Learned from Water Privatization in Multiple Countries", JOURNAL OF ECONOMY CULTURE AND SOCIETY, sa.65, ss.129-160, 2022
dc.identifier.issn2602-2656
dc.identifier.otherav_57d216d6-df03-4169-a950-607ec0c0420e
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/182850
dc.identifier.urihttps://avesis.istanbul.edu.tr/api/publication/57d216d6-df03-4169-a950-607ec0c0420e/file
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.26650/jecs2021-943895
dc.description.abstractThe transformation of water services is among the issues that have entered the world agenda in the last 30 years. Although recommendations from international organizations affect water policies of individual countries, water privatization realized as public-private cooperation has been spurred by the idea of establishing new markets for global water companies. This transition is rooted in the neoliberal policies of such international organizations. This study, which follows the literature review method, aims to examine the reasons underlying the privatization of water services as well as the privatization practices implemented in different countries. The results reveal that excluding the countries where privatization is offered as a credit requirement by international organizations (India, Argentina, Bolivia, and Turkey), in developed countries (France and England) where privatization is conducted without coercion, water services management has not been successful and cannot be used as an example for other countries. In contrast, many cities in developed and developing countries have recently implemented remunicipalization, returning the control of water services to public authorities. Finally, countries that have implemented privatization have failed in terms of financing, investment and efficiency, and the privatization process has imposed additional financial burdens. Water privatization, therefore, cannot be considered as a solution to water management.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectSociology and Political Science
dc.subjectSocial Sciences & Humanities
dc.subjectGeneral Social Sciences
dc.subjectGenel Sosyoloji ve Metedoloji
dc.subjectSosyoloji
dc.subjectSosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler
dc.subjectSosyal Bilimler (SOC)
dc.subjectSosyal Bilimler Genel
dc.subjectSOSYOLOJİ
dc.titleTransformation of Water Services: Lessons Learned from Water Privatization in Multiple Countries
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF ECONOMY CULTURE AND SOCIETY
dc.contributor.departmentTrakya Üniversitesi , ,
dc.identifier.issue65
dc.identifier.startpage129
dc.identifier.endpage160
dc.contributor.firstauthorID3433004


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record