Association between use of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols and postoperative complications in colorectal surgery in Europe: The EuroPOWER international observational study
Author
Goettel, Nicolai
Jammer, Ib
Mena, Gabriel E.
Zorrilla-Vaca, Andres
Marino, Marco
Ripolles-Melchor, Javier
Abad-Motos, Ane
Cecconi, Maurizio
Pearse, Rupert
Jaber, Samir
Slim, Karem
Francis, Nader
Spinelli, Antonino
Joris, Jean
Ioannidis, Orestis
Zarzava, Eirini
Senturk, Nuzhet Mert
Koopman, Seppe
Diez-Remesal, Yolanda
Stundner, Ottokar
Suarez-de-la-Rica, Alejandro
Garcia-Erce, Jose A.
Logrono-Ejea, Margarita
Ferrando-Ortola, Carlos
De-Fuenmayor-Valera, Maria L.
Ugarte-Sierra, Bakarne
De Andres-Ibanez, Jose
Abad-Gurumeta, Alfredo
Pellino, Gianluca
Gomez-Rios, Manuel A.
Poggioli, Gilberto
Menzo-Wolthuis, Albert
Castellano-Paulis, Berta
Vymazal, Tomas
Kocian, Petr
El-Hussuna, Alaa
Pedziwiatr, Michal
Gudaityte, Jurate
Latkauskas, Tadas
Santos, Marisa D.
Machado, Humberto
Zahorec, Roman
Cvetkovic, Ana
Miric, Mirjana
Georgiou, Maria
Galan-Menendez, Patricia
Aldecoa, Cesar
Ramirez-Rodriguez, Jose M.
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Study objective: Assess the relationship between the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS (R)) pathway and routine care and 30-day postoperative outcomes.& nbsp;Design: Prospective cohort study.& nbsp;Setting: European centers (185 hospitals) across 21 countries.& nbsp;Patients: A total of 2841 adult patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. Each hospital had a 1-month recruitment period between October 2019 and September 2020.& nbsp;Interventions: Routine perioperative care.& nbsp;Measurements: Twenty-four components of the ERAS pathway were assessed in all patients regardless of whether they were treated in a formal ERAS pathway. A multivariable and multilevel logistic regression model was used to adjust for baseline risk factors, ERAS elements and country-based differences.& nbsp;Results: A total of 1835 patients (65%) received perioperative care at a self-declared ERAS center, 474 (16.7%) developed moderate-to-severe postoperative complications, and 63 patients died (2.2%). There was no difference in the primary outcome between patients who were or were not treated in self-declared ERAS centers (17.1% vs. 16%; OR 1.00; 95%CI, 0.79-1.27; P = 0.986). Hospital stay was shorter among patients treated in self-declared ERAS centers (6 [5-9] vs. 8 [6-10] days; OR 0.82; 95%CI, 0.78-0.87; P = 65% vs. < 48%) suggested that patients with the highest adherence rates experienced a lower risk of moderate-to-severe complications (15.9% vs. 17.8%; OR 0.71; 95%CI, 0.53-0.96; P = 0.027), lower risk of death (0.3% vs. 2.9%; OR 0.10; 95%CI, 0.02-0.42; P = 0.002) and shorter hospital stay (6 [4-8] vs. 7 [5-10] days; OR 0.74; 95%CI, 0.69-0.79; P < 0.001).& nbsp;Conclusions: Treatment in a self-declared ERAS center does not improve outcome after colorectal surgery. Increased adherence to the ERAS pathway is associated with a significant reduction in overall postoperative complications, lower risk of moderate-to-severe complications, shorter length of hospital stay and lower 30-day mortality.
Collections
- Makale [92796]