Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorBUCAK, UMUR
dc.contributor.authorBalin, Abit
dc.contributor.authorDemirel, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorMollaoglu, Mahmut
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-04T15:24:04Z
dc.date.available2022-07-04T15:24:04Z
dc.identifier.citationMollaoglu M., BUCAK U., Demirel H., Balin A., "Evaluation of various fuel alternatives in terms of sustainability for the ship investment decision using single valued neutrosophic numbers with TOPSIS methods", PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART M-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR THE MARITIME ENVIRONMENT, 2022
dc.identifier.issn1475-0902
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_ace87923-0bde-48a0-b9e5-fcf90378538d
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/184203
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/14750902221103433
dc.description.abstractIMO has introduced regulations to improve fuel quality in the sector to reduce emissions from ships carrying the vast majority of world trade. As a result of these regulations, which were planned gradually, carbon-neutral shipping was targeted. In line with this goal, it was seen that ship operating companies tend to various alternatives to increase fuel quality. This study evaluated various fuel alternatives for ship investment decisions by employing the Technique for Order Preference By Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method under the Single Valued Neutrosophic Sets (SVNS) in terms of sustainability aspects. First, criteria that are specific to the ship investment decision under the aspects of sustainability and their weights were determined. Then, these weights were placed in the model to determine the most sustainable ship fuel produced within the scope of the study. Finally, alternatives determined in terms of fuel type, which is one of the items to be decided on ship investment, were listed according to their degree of sustainability. According to the findings, dual fuel and bio-fuel were selected as more sustainable bunker fuels for today. Technically, findings were evaluated, and the pros and cons of the related bunker fuels were revealed. In the light of the findings, evaluations were made on alternatives.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectPhysical Sciences
dc.subjectGeneral Engineering
dc.subjectDeniz Bilimleri ve Teknolojisi
dc.subjectMühendislik ve Teknoloji
dc.subjectEngineering (miscellaneous)
dc.subjectMühendislik, Bilişim ve Teknoloji (ENG)
dc.subjectMühendislik
dc.subjectMÜHENDİSLİK, DENİZ
dc.titleEvaluation of various fuel alternatives in terms of sustainability for the ship investment decision using single valued neutrosophic numbers with TOPSIS methods
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalPROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART M-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR THE MARITIME ENVIRONMENT
dc.contributor.departmentZonguldak Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi , ,
dc.contributor.firstauthorID3433974


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster