Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTahtabasi, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorErturk, Sukru Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorEr, Sadettin
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-04T16:50:51Z
dc.date.available2022-07-04T16:50:51Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationTahtabasi M., Er S., Erturk S. M. , "Can peritoneal thickening and enhancement be used to determine perforation in patients with acute appendicitis ?", ULUSAL TRAVMA VE ACIL CERRAHI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF TRAUMA & EMERGENCY SURGERY, cilt.28, sa.4, ss.428-433, 2022
dc.identifier.issn1306-696X
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_fd2b8c21-c534-4a7e-a280-22a8e4ff4890
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/185491
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2020.58991
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis (AA) is a common cause of abdominal pain in developed countries. In patients with suspected AA, computed tomography (CT) is considered as the gold standard with the highest sensitivity and specificity, and it is also an im-portant modality, especially in patients with complicated AA. In this study, we aimed to evaluate age and laboratory findings, as well as specific CT findings in differentiating between perforated and non-perforated appendicitis. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 252 patients diagnosed with AA and underwent appendectomy between November 2015 and December 2019 in Somalia Mogadishu Recep Tayyip Erdogan Education and Research Hospital. Patients under 18 years of age and those with no pre-operative CT scans were excluded from the study. The demographic, laboratory, CT findings, and pathological data of all patients were evaluated. RESULTS: This study included 80 patients, 32 (40%) classified as perforated appendicitis (Group-1) and 48 (60%) as non-perforated appendicitis (Group-2). The C-reactive protein value was found to be statistically higher in Group-1 than in Group-2 (177.5 +/- 118.9 and 100.2 +/- 87.3 mg / L, respectively; p=0.001). The appendix lumen diameter (p=0.002), appendix wall defect (p<0.001), peritoneal thickening and enhancement (p<0.001), ascites (p=0.031), intra-abdominal abscess (p=0.003), jejunal thickening (p=0.019), ileal thick-ening (p=0.008), and ileus (p=0.035) values were significantly higher in Group-1. In the binominal logistic regression analysis performed with statistically significant data, an appendiceal wall defect (OR: 0.069, 95% CI=0.014-0.327, p=0.001) and peritoneal thickening and enhancement (OR: 0.131, 95% CI=0.024-0.714, p=0.019) were identified as independent variables for perforated appendicitis. CONCLUSION: Among CT findings, appendix wall defects and peritoneal thickening and enhancement play an important role in detecting perforation.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectEmergency Medicine
dc.subjectHealth Sciences
dc.subjectCerrahi Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectEmergency Medical Services
dc.subjectAcil Tıp
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectACİL TIP
dc.titleCan peritoneal thickening and enhancement be used to determine perforation in patients with acute appendicitis ?
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalULUSAL TRAVMA VE ACIL CERRAHI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF TRAUMA & EMERGENCY SURGERY
dc.contributor.departmentUniv Hlth Sci , ,
dc.identifier.volume28
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.startpage428
dc.identifier.endpage433
dc.contributor.firstauthorID3407236


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record