Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorCetingok, Halil
dc.contributor.authorSerce, Gokhan Isik
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-21T07:19:41Z
dc.date.available2023-02-21T07:19:41Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationCetingok H., Serce G. I., "Does the application of pulse radiofrequency to the suprascapular nerve provide additional benefit in patients who have undergone glenohumeral intra-articular steroid injection and suprascapular nerve block?", AGRI-THE JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH SOCIETY OF ALGOLOGY, cilt.34, sa.4, ss.272-277, 2022
dc.identifier.issn1300-0012
dc.identifier.otherav_043bf6fd-04af-4270-87d2-d9a7ace5ba22
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/185711
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.14744/agri.2022.44342
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Shoulder pain is one of the most common musculoskeletal pain syndromes. Interventional treatments can be applied to patients who do not respond to conservative therapies. Intra-articular steroid injection and suprascapular nerve block are both short-acting and may sometimes be clinically inadequate. In this study, the answer to the question of whether pulse radiofrequency application to the suprascapular nerve provides additional benefit was investigated. Methods: Patients who had shoulder pain and were injected between October 2016 and April 2018 were evaluated retrospectively. Totally 160 patients who underwent shoulder injections were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups: 114 patients who underwent shoulder intra-articular steroid injection and suprascapular nerve block, as Group 1 and 46 patients who underwent pulse radiofrequency to the suprascapular nerve, in addition to shoulder intra-articular steroid injection and suprascapular nerve block, as Group 2. Results: There was no statistical difference between the groups in pre-intervention numerical rating scale (NRS) scores. One month after the intervention, NRS scores of Group 2 were significantly lower than Group 1. In both groups, 1 month after the intervention NRS scores were significantly lower than pre-intervention. The duration of pain relief for Group 2 was longer than Group 1. The satisfaction percentages of patients for Group 2 were higher than Group 1. Conclusion: In addition to glenohumeral intra-articular steroid injection and suprascapular nerve block, pulse radiofrequency application to the suprascapular nerve provides additional benefits in terms of NRS scores, duration of pain relief, and patient satisfaction.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectTemel Bilgi ve Beceriler
dc.subjectDeğerlendirme ve Teşhis
dc.subjectDahiliye
dc.subjectAile Sağlığı
dc.subjectTıp (çeşitli)
dc.subjectGenel Tıp
dc.subjectGenel Sağlık Meslekleri
dc.subjectPatofizyoloji
dc.subjectTemel Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectTIP, GENEL & DAHİLİ
dc.titleDoes the application of pulse radiofrequency to the suprascapular nerve provide additional benefit in patients who have undergone glenohumeral intra-articular steroid injection and suprascapular nerve block?
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalAGRI-THE JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH SOCIETY OF ALGOLOGY
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi , İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi , Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü
dc.identifier.volume34
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.startpage272
dc.identifier.endpage277
dc.contributor.firstauthorID4075913


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster