Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorDemirel, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorBAŞHAN, VEYSİ
dc.contributor.authorGul, Muhammet
dc.contributor.authorYucesan, Melih
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-21T10:35:12Z
dc.date.available2023-02-21T10:35:12Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationBAŞHAN V., Yucesan M., Demirel H., Gul M., "Health, safety, and environmental failure evaluation by hybridizing fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making methods for maritime scrubber systems", ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, cilt.194, sa.9, 2022
dc.identifier.issn0167-6369
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_4745466d-e8df-407e-83e9-58d4be014fea
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/188532
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10284-5
dc.description.abstractMany shipping companies have started using scrubbers in their fleet to eliminate sulfur emissions from ships, per IMO (International Maritime Organization) rules. Before and during the scrubbers' selection, the scrubbers' operational failures have also started to appear and cause serious concerns. In this study, classified scrubber types are explained and open type, closed type, and hybrid scrubber systems are evaluated. To contribute to this gap in the literature, scrubber failures were identified, five experts with different perspectives were consulted, and the most common and critical malfunctions were evaluated with the fuzzy best-worst method (F-BWM) and fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (F-TOPSIS). F-BWM was used to determine the importance weights of the risk parameters used in evaluating failures since it provides fewer comparisons among pairwise comparison-based decision-making methods and a more consistent judgment in the evaluation. F-TOPSIS, on the other hand, was used to determine the final priority scores of the scrubber failures, taking into account the risk parameter weights obtained in the first stage. It has been preferred due to its easy to useness and based on its closeness to the ideal solution and applicability to risk and failure analysis problems. Considering all different systems in general, important issues such as collection efficiency, sulfur emission problem, abrasion, leakages, pump failures, heat exchanger failures, air fan sealing failures, sensors and failures in monitoring the whole system have been investigated. Results show that too high axial velocity for separator and flooded separator, too high solids concentration in recirculation liquid (SF2), piping leakages (SF5), poor quality or inappropriate consumables and chemicals (SF11), and feed circulation pump problems (SF6) are found to be the most important problems among thirteen failures.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectÇevre Bilimi (çeşitli)
dc.subjectSu Bilimi
dc.subjectFizik Bilimleri
dc.subjectYaşam Bilimleri
dc.subjectTarımsal Bilimler
dc.subjectÇevre Mühendisliği
dc.subjectMühendislik ve Teknoloji
dc.subjectDoğa ve Peyzaj Koruma
dc.subjectTarım ve Çevre Bilimleri (AGE)
dc.subjectÇevre / Ekoloji
dc.subjectÇEVRE BİLİMLERİ
dc.titleHealth, safety, and environmental failure evaluation by hybridizing fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making methods for maritime scrubber systems
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT
dc.contributor.departmentBursa Teknik Üniversitesi , ,
dc.identifier.volume194
dc.identifier.issue9
dc.contributor.firstauthorID3447109


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster