Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOzturker, Can
dc.contributor.authorÖZBİLEN, Kemal Turgay
dc.contributor.authorCukurova Kartal, Selva Nur
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-29T12:53:06Z
dc.date.available2023-05-29T12:53:06Z
dc.identifier.citationCukurova Kartal S. N., Ozturker C., ÖZBİLEN K. T., "Septum-sparing minimally invasive technique for levator advancement surgery in aponeurotic ptosis.", Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2023
dc.identifier.issn0721-832X
dc.identifier.otherav_255290b9-6117-4efa-9c27-f00973a57b17
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/188916
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85148090110&origin=inward
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-023-06001-8
dc.description.abstract© 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.Purpose: To evaluate the outcome of small incision levator advancement with septum-sparing technique and compare it with standard levator advancement. Methods: The surgical findings and clinical data of patients with aponeurotic ptosis who underwent small incision or standard levator advancement surgery in our clinic between 2018 and 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. For both groups; age, gender, systemic and ophthalmic comorbidities, levator function, preoperative and postoperative margin-reflex distance, change in margin-reflex distance after surgery, symmetry between the eyes, follow-up time, perioperative and postoperative complications (under/overcorrection, contour irregularity, lagophthalmos) were all evaluated and recorded. Results: The study included 82 eyes, 46 from 31 patients in Group I who had small incision surgery, and 36 from 26 patients in Group II who had standard levator surgery. There was no statistically significant difference in surgical success between the two groups (80% and 81% respectively, p = 0.692). The levator function and preoperative margin-reflex distance correlated positively with surgical success. Conclusion: Small incision levator advancement is a less invasive procedure than standard levator advancement because of the smaller skin incision and preservation of orbital septum integrity, but it requires good knowledge of eyelid anatomy and experience in eyelid surgery. In patients with aponeurotic ptosis, this surgery can be performed as a safe and effective surgical technique with a similar success rate as standard levator advancement. [Figure not available: see fulltext.].
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectCerrahi Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectGöz Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi
dc.subjectYaşam Bilimleri
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectTemel Bilimler
dc.subjectOftalmoloji
dc.subjectDuyusal Sistemler
dc.subjectHücresel ve Moleküler Sinirbilim
dc.subjectGÖZ HASTALIKLARI
dc.subjectSinirbilim ve Davranış
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectYaşam Bilimleri (LIFE)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectSİNİR BİLİMİ
dc.titleSeptum-sparing minimally invasive technique for levator advancement surgery in aponeurotic ptosis.
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Tıp Fakültesi , ,
dc.contributor.firstauthorID4253791


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record