Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorIdiz, Cemile
dc.contributor.authorDinççağ, Nevin
dc.contributor.authorÇelik, Selda
dc.contributor.authorTütüncü, Yıldız
dc.contributor.authorBağdemir, Elif
dc.contributor.authorÖztop, Nida
dc.contributor.authorKubat Üzüm, Ayşe
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-29T13:28:05Z
dc.date.available2023-05-29T13:28:05Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationÖztop N., Kubat Üzüm A., Çelik S., Idiz C., Tütüncü Y., Bağdemir E., Dinççağ N., "DETERMINING THE IMPORTANCE OF GLYCEMIC VARIABILITY IN GESTATIONAL DIABETES MELLITUS USING VARIOUS TECHNIQUES GESTASYONEL DİABETES MELLİTUSTA GLİSEMİK DEĞİŞKENLİKLERİN ÖNEMİ VE FARKLI YÖNTEMLERLE ARAŞTIRILMASI", Istanbul Tip Fakultesi Dergisi, cilt.86, sa.1, ss.44-51, 2023
dc.identifier.issn1305-6433
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_328911fd-05b3-4eba-9099-f74a2b35e943
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/189031
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85149038674&origin=inward
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.26650/iuitfd.1193997
dc.description.abstractObjective: The study aims to determine glycemic variation in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and to evaluate the effect on the fetal growth using a continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) and to investigate the correlation between glucose variation through biomarkers including HbA1c, fructosamine (FRM), and 1.5-Anhydroglucitol (1.5-AG). Materials and Methods: The study involves 31 women with GDM at gestational week ≥35 who'd only had diet therapy. Blood glucose levels were monitored for three consecutive days using CGMS to evaluate mean blood glucose levels and mean absolute difference (MAD). Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) was required from the patients while having the CMGS on their body. Blood samples were collected to measure serum 1.5-AG, HbA1c, and FRM. Results: The mean levels were HbA1c=5.0±0.3%, FRM=2.1±0.2 μmol/L, 1.5-AG=17.0±4.9 ng/ml, and 3-day average max-min glucose range=131.1±22.5 and 54.7±11.6 mg/dl (MAD=6.7±3.1%). The mean glucose levels measured using SMBG and CGMS were similar (82.9±10.2 vs 86.1±10.3 mg/dL). No correlation occurred between CMGS and biomarkers. The baby weight at birth and head circumference was determined to be lower for patients with glucose fluctuations. Conclusion: Biomarkers do not reflect glycemic fluctuation, and regular SMBG is required to achieve the desired glucose level, even in diet-regulated GDM. Lower head circumference and birth weight were determined in GDM mothers with high glycemic fluctuations, and CGMS may be an alternative method despite its cost and application difficulties.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectGenel Tıp
dc.subjectTemel Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectTIP, GENEL & DAHİLİ
dc.titleDETERMINING THE IMPORTANCE OF GLYCEMIC VARIABILITY IN GESTATIONAL DIABETES MELLITUS USING VARIOUS TECHNIQUES GESTASYONEL DİABETES MELLİTUSTA GLİSEMİK DEĞİŞKENLİKLERİN ÖNEMİ VE FARKLI YÖNTEMLERLE ARAŞTIRILMASI
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalIstanbul Tip Fakultesi Dergisi
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi , ,
dc.identifier.volume86
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage44
dc.identifier.endpage51
dc.contributor.firstauthorID4256381


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record