Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorEsmaeilzadeh, Sina
dc.contributor.authorOral, Aydan
dc.contributor.authorDernek, Bahar
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-03T07:50:23Z
dc.date.available2021-03-03T07:50:23Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationDernek B., Esmaeilzadeh S., Oral A., "The utility of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health checklist for evaluating disability in a community-dwelling geriatric population sample.", International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation, cilt.38, sa.2, ss.144-55, 2015
dc.identifier.issn0342-5282
dc.identifier.otherav_14313320-18ee-435c-bfcc-13fd3ba18a77
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/18972
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/mrr.0000000000000101
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to investigate disability in community-dwelling individuals aged 65 years and over using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) checklist and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS-II) and to compare how these two ICF-based instruments measured disability in an attempt to show the utility of the ICF checklist in a field setting to describe disability. In this population-based, cross-sectional and descriptive study, data on the ICF checklist and the WHODAS-II were collected from 200 selected participants who lived in a small town. Both the ICF checklist and the WHODAS-II identified a considerable proportion of the elderly with a disability in life areas relevant to cognition and domestic life in a similar manner, the proportions ranging from 52.5 to 68.5%. However, the proportions of those with a disability showed a statistically significant difference in the domains of the two instruments relevant to mobility, self-care, and participation in society. Although the absolute intrarater agreement for matching items of the instruments ranged from 40.5 to 87.5%, kappa statistics showed slight to moderate agreement for the original ICF qualifier and mostly moderate agreement with reduced response options. ICF qualifiers were found to discriminate between the WHODAS-II domain scores in those with no, mild-moderate and severe-complete difficulty. The disparity between the data obtained from the ICF checklist and the WHODAS-II in some domains may have resulted from differing interpretations of the items of the ICF checklist, lower reliability of some of the items, and the current feature of the qualifiers used without any adaptations. The ICF checklist has the potential to be used in a field setting, provided that some modifications are made. Copyright (C) 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectFiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectREHABİLİTASYON
dc.titleThe utility of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health checklist for evaluating disability in a community-dwelling geriatric population sample.
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalInternational journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi , ,
dc.identifier.volume38
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.startpage144
dc.identifier.endpage55
dc.contributor.firstauthorID11518


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster