Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGencer, Aysegul
dc.contributor.authorMusellim, Benan
dc.contributor.authorÇALIŞKANER ÖZTÜRK, BUKET
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-10T12:46:45Z
dc.date.available2023-10-10T12:46:45Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationGencer A., ÇALIŞKANER ÖZTÜRK B., Musellim B., "Investigating the Differences in Polysomnography Results Evaluated According to the Recommended and Alternative Hypopnea Criteria Utilized in the Evaluation of Polysomnography", TURKISH THORACIC JOURNAL, cilt.23, sa.6, ss.383-386, 2022
dc.identifier.issn2149-2530
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_25a1a483-f62e-40b6-8486-8c45628447b1
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/190237
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5152/turkthoracj.2022.22069
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: The criteria of hypopnea recommended by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine until 2012 was 3% desaturation and 50% decline in the signal amplitude. The recommended and alternative criteria for hypopnea were determined as 3% desaturation accompanied by a 30% decline in the signal amplitude and 4% desaturation accompanied by a 30% decline in the amplitude by the 2013 update of the guideline was published by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine in 2012. The objective of our study was to investigate to what degree scoring of hypopneas has great importance in the diagnosis and severity grading of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome according to different criteria. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The present study was designed as a retrospective study in which the results of the polysomnography of 62 patients were recorded after evaluation according to 3 different hypopnea criteria. Criteria 1, criteria 2, and criteria 3 were accepted as a 3% drop in SaO 2 accompanied by a 30% decline in the amplitude, as a 4% drop in SaO 2 accompanied by a 30% decline in the amplitude, and as a 3% drop in SaO 2 accompanied with a 50% decline in the amplitude, respectively. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were determined between criteria 1 and criteria 2, criteria 1 and criteria 3, and criteria 2 and criteria 3 regarding the numbers of hypopneas. CONCLUSION: For the same polysomnography, evaluations with different accepted hypopnea criteria cause different polysomnography results.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectAkciğer ve Solunum Tıbbı
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectSolunum Bakımı
dc.subjectGöğüs Hastalıkları ve Allerji
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectSOLUNUM SİSTEMİ
dc.titleInvestigating the Differences in Polysomnography Results Evaluated According to the Recommended and Alternative Hypopnea Criteria Utilized in the Evaluation of Polysomnography
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalTURKISH THORACIC JOURNAL
dc.contributor.departmentStanbul Bakirkoy Dr Sadi Konuk Educ & Res Hosp , ,
dc.identifier.volume23
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.startpage383
dc.identifier.endpage386
dc.contributor.firstauthorID4311214


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record