Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSoysal, Aysun
dc.contributor.authorKOLBAŞI, ESMA NUR
dc.contributor.authorERSÖZ HÜSEYİNSİNOĞLU, BURCU
dc.contributor.authorOzdemir, Zeynep
dc.contributor.authorBAYRAKTAROĞLU, Zübeyir
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-10T12:51:53Z
dc.date.available2023-10-10T12:51:53Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationKOLBAŞI E. N., ERSÖZ HÜSEYİNSİNOĞLU B., Ozdemir Z., BAYRAKTAROĞLU Z., Soysal A., "Enhancement of motor skill acquisition by intermittent theta burst stimulation: a pilot study", ACTA NEUROLOGICA BELGICA, sa.3, ss.971-977, 2023
dc.identifier.issn0300-9009
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_27f4a360-a3e3-4cde-a14b-c14658f22be3
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/190306
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-022-02155-0
dc.description.abstractObjective This study aims to analyze the effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) on motor skill acquisition of healthy subjects when applied on alternate days to ensure high adherence to treatment. Materials and methods Ten healthy participants (40-54 years) were included in the study. The control group (CG) (60% female) only received motor training (i.e., finger tapping task-FTTa), whereas the experimental group (EG) (100% female) received iTBS in addition to the motor training (every other day for 5 sessions). Cortical excitability measurements were taken with TMS. The correct sequences of the finger tapping test (FTTe) were recorded for behavioral analysis. Results While SICI was increased by 0.03 in EG, ICF was increased by 0.18 between pre-and post-treatment. On the other hand, CG had a lower ICF difference (MD: 0.05) and a higher SICI difference (MD: 0.21). There was no difference between EG and CG in FTTe at the end of the intervention (p > 0.05 for all variables), except for the increased number of correct sequences within the EG (p = 0.018). There was a significant difference in FTTa between EG and CG, in favor of EG (p = 0.042). The effect size was 0.62. Conclusion Although no difference was found in terms of cortical excitability and FTTe between the EG and CG at the end of the alternate-day treatment, it seemed like iTBS increased cortical facilitation further than CG. Furthermore, the number of correct sequences in FTTe and FTTa was significantly increased in EG, showing that intermittent iTBS might improve motor learning and performance.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectGenel Sinirbilim
dc.subjectİnsan Bilgisayar Etkileşimi
dc.subjectFizik Bilimleri
dc.subjectNöroloji (klinik)
dc.subjectKLİNİK NÖROLOJİ
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectSİNİR BİLİMİ
dc.subjectSinirbilim ve Davranış
dc.subjectYaşam Bilimleri (LIFE)
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectNöroloji
dc.subjectYaşam Bilimleri
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectTemel Bilimler
dc.subjectDuyusal Sistemler
dc.subjectGelişimsel Sinirbilim
dc.subjectBilişsel Sinirbilim
dc.subjectHücresel ve Moleküler Sinirbilim
dc.subjectSinirbilim (çeşitli)
dc.titleEnhancement of motor skill acquisition by intermittent theta burst stimulation: a pilot study
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalACTA NEUROLOGICA BELGICA
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi , ,
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.startpage971
dc.identifier.endpage977
dc.contributor.firstauthorID4313963


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record