Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKulekci, Guven
dc.contributor.authorTopcuoglu, Nursen
dc.contributor.authorKarabuda, Zihni Cuneyt
dc.contributor.authorArisan, Volkan
dc.contributor.authorArici, Selahattin Volkan
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-03T08:20:06Z
dc.date.available2021-03-03T08:20:06Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationArisan V., Karabuda Z. C. , Arici S. V. , Topcuoglu N., Kulekci G., "A Randomized Clinical Trial of an Adjunct Diode Laser Application for the Nonsurgical Treatment of Peri-Implantitis", PHOTOMEDICINE AND LASER SURGERY, cilt.33, sa.11, ss.547-554, 2015
dc.identifier.issn1549-5418
dc.identifier.otherav_16fd040e-f8ed-4720-a1c6-d6019c7a8ab9
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/20788
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2015.3956
dc.description.abstractObjective: In this radiographic and microbiologic split-mouth clinical trial, efficacy of a diode laser as an adjunct to conventional scaling in the nonsurgical treatment of peri-implantitis was investigated. Background data: Eradication of pathogenic bacteria and infected sulcular epithelium presents a significant challenge in the nonsurgical treatment of peri-implantitis. Materials and methods: Ten patients (mean age, 55.1 years; SD, 11.4) with 48 two piece, rough-surface implants and diagnosed with peri-implantitis were recruited (NCT02362854). In addition to conventional scaling and debridement (control group), crevicular sulci and the corresponding surfaces of 24 random implants were lased by a diode laser running at 1.0W power at the pulsed mode (, 810nm; energy density, 3J/cm(2); time, 1min; power density, 400mW/cm2; energy, 1.5 J; and spot diameter, 1mm); (laser group). Healing was assessed via periodontal indexes (baseline and after 1 and 6 months after the intervention), microbiologic specimens (baseline and after 1 month), and radiographs (baseline and after 6 months). Results: Baseline mean pocket depths (4.71, SD, 0.67; and 4.38, SD 0.42mm) and marginal bone loss (2.71, SD 0.11; and 2.88, SD 0.18mm) were similar (p=0.09 and p=0.12) between the control and laser groups, respectively. After 6 months, the laser group revealed higher marginal bone loss (2.79, SD 0.48) than the control groups (2.63, SD 0.53) (p<0.0001). However, in both groups, the microbiota of the implants was found unchanged after 1 month. Conclusions: In this clinical trial, adjunct use of diode laser did not yield any additional positive influence on the peri-implant healing compared with conventional scaling alone.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectCERRAHİ
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectCerrahi Tıp Bilimleri
dc.titleA Randomized Clinical Trial of an Adjunct Diode Laser Application for the Nonsurgical Treatment of Peri-Implantitis
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalPHOTOMEDICINE AND LASER SURGERY
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi , ,
dc.identifier.volume33
dc.identifier.issue11
dc.identifier.startpage547
dc.identifier.endpage554
dc.contributor.firstauthorID74690


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record