Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorŞANLI, Mehmet Öner
dc.contributor.authorOKTAR, Tayfun Mevlüt
dc.contributor.authorÖZCAN, Faruk
dc.contributor.authorERDEM, Selçuk
dc.contributor.authorTEFIK, Tzevat
dc.contributor.authorANDER, Ali Haluk
dc.contributor.authorNANE, İsmet
dc.contributor.authorAKINCI, Hacı Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorKOÇAK, Taner
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-03T09:44:48Z
dc.date.available2021-03-03T09:44:48Z
dc.identifier.citationTEFIK T., ERDEM S., KOÇAK T., OKTAR T. M. , ŞANLI M. Ö. , ÖZCAN F., ANDER A. H. , AKINCI H. M. , NANE İ., "Success rate of expanded indications (non-adherence to guidelines) for SWL using semi-integrated lithotripter in a mid volume stone center", World Congress of Endourology, Cape Town, Güney Afrika, 8 - 12 Kasım 2016, ss.106
dc.identifier.otherav_1eab3711-0b65-4c23-bc34-97fe4495b478
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/25758
dc.identifier.urihttps://avesis.istanbul.edu.tr/api/publication/1eab3711-0b65-4c23-bc34-97fe4495b478/file
dc.description.abstractAim: Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) has emerged and established itself as a first-line option for management of urolithiasis. There are not many studies examining patterns adhering or not, to the latest AUA/EAU guidelines. The aim of the study was to assess the success of expanded indications (non-adherence to guidelines) of patients managed by SWL for urinary stone disease using a semi-integrated lithotripter at a single tertiary center and to compare the results of a group of patients undergoing SWL with indications adhering to the guidelines. Patients and Methods: One hundred and nine cases undergoing SLW for renal or ureteral stones were evaluated. The procedures were performed by a single SWL technician with a Dornier Compact Delta II® semi-integrated lithotripter. Stone free rates were evaluated with KUB 10 days following SWL. Cases were divided into 2 groups namely: Group 1, adherence to guidelines for SWL indications and Group 2, expanded criteria (stone size>20mm, lower pole stone size>10mm, attenuation > 1000 HU)(non-adherence). Success rate among groups were compared. Results: Group1 and 2 had 17 and 92 cases, respectively. Group 1 and 2 had stone free rate of 60% (9/15) vs 28% (26/94), (p=0.018), where 20% (3/15) vs 36% (34/94), [not significant (ns)] of patients had fragmentation but not complete stone passage and 20% (3/15) vs 18% (17/94), (ns), had no fragmentation at all, and 2 vs 15 patients were lost on follow up, respectively. One complication with a patient having streintrasse and 10 patients with emergency department visit for renal colic was observed on Group 2. Conclusion: Adherence to guidelines for selecting patients undergoing SWL procedure has significant impact on SFRs
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectTıp
dc.titleSuccess rate of expanded indications (non-adherence to guidelines) for SWL using semi-integrated lithotripter in a mid volume stone center
dc.typeBildiri
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi , İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi , Üroloji
dc.contributor.firstauthorID295210


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster