Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDelgado, L
dc.contributor.authorPadhy, A
dc.contributor.authorZhu, HQ
dc.contributor.authorGonzalez, P
dc.contributor.authorMut, F
dc.contributor.authorMassardo, T
dc.contributor.authorAlonso, O
dc.contributor.authorKabasakal, L
dc.contributor.authorLlamas-Olier, A
dc.contributor.authorShankar, UR
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-03T10:44:00Z
dc.date.available2021-03-03T10:44:00Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.identifier.citationMassardo T., Alonso O., Kabasakal L., Llamas-Olier A., Shankar U., Zhu H., Delgado L., Gonzalez P., Mut F., Padhy A., "Diagnostic value of Tc-99m-methylene diphosphonate and Tc-99m-pentavalent DMSA compared with Tc-99m-sestamibi for palpable breast lesions", JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, cilt.43, sa.7, ss.882-888, 2002
dc.identifier.issn0161-5505
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_24550449-d70b-4a60-8838-2a642167b9aa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/29325
dc.description.abstractDifferent radiopharmaceuticals have been used to detect breast cancer. Among them, sestamibi has been extensively studied and has come to have a well-recognized role in the evaluation of palpable breast lesions. The goal of this study was to compare the diagnostic value of Tc-99m-labeled compounds, such as methylene diphosphonate (MDP) and pentavalent dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA-V), with sestamibi for palpable breast lesions, in the scope of a multicenter trial sponsored by the International Atomic Energy Agency. Methods: Patients from 7 countries were included: 47 women (mean age, 54 +/- 13 y) examined with MDP and sestamibi and 111 women (mean age, 55 +/- 12 y) examined with DMSA-V and sestamibi. Cancer was diagnosed in 41 of 49 lesions from the MDP group and in 78 of 113 lesions from the DMSA-V group. Axillary lymph node involvement was observed in 18 of 30 patients from the first group and in 27 of 53 patients from the second group. Prone scintimammography was performed using a dose of 740 MBq of each tracer, and diagnostic values were calculated from a masked interpretation of scans. Results: In the first group, the sensitivity for sestamibi and MDP studies was 82.9% and 65.9%, respectively, with a specificity of 87.5% and 50%, respectively. In the second group, the sensitivity for sestamibi and DMSA-N studies was 87.2% and 65.4%, respectively, with a specificity of 77.1% and 74.3%, respectively. Regarding axillary involvement, the sensitivity was 33.3% for sestamibi in both groups, whereas the values for MDP and DMSA-V were 16.7% and 7.4%, respectively. In contrast, the specificity for sestamibi was 83.3% and 92.3% for the first and second groups, respectively, and the specificity for MDP and DMSA-V was 91.7% and 100%, respectively. Conclusion: Sestamibi is the most adequate alternative among the mentioned Tc-99m-labeled radiopharmaceuticals for the evaluation of palpable breast lesions.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectNükleer Tıp
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectRADYOLOJİ, NÜKLEER TIP ve MEDİKAL GÖRÜNTÜLEME
dc.titleDiagnostic value of Tc-99m-methylene diphosphonate and Tc-99m-pentavalent DMSA compared with Tc-99m-sestamibi for palpable breast lesions
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
dc.contributor.department, ,
dc.identifier.volume43
dc.identifier.issue7
dc.identifier.startpage882
dc.identifier.endpage888
dc.contributor.firstauthorID165536


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record