Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorArpinar, I. S.
dc.contributor.authorEmes, Yusuf
dc.contributor.authorOncu, B.
dc.contributor.authorIssever, H.
dc.contributor.authorAybar, B.
dc.contributor.authorAKTAS, I.
dc.contributor.authorYalçın, Sema
dc.contributor.authorAl Badri, N.
dc.contributor.authorAtalay, B.
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-03T11:30:52Z
dc.date.available2021-03-03T11:30:52Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationEmes Y., Arpinar I. S. , Oncu B., Aybar B., AKTAS I., Al Badri N., Atalay B., Issever H., Yalçın S., "The next step in the treatment of persistent temporomandibular joint pain following arthrocentesis: A retrospective study of 18 cases", JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, cilt.42, sa.5, 2014
dc.identifier.issn1010-5182
dc.identifier.otherav_28548691-4473-42a6-a114-08df444909ce
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/31976
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2013.06.010
dc.description.abstractTemporomandibular joint disorders affect a big portion of the population. There are a variety of treatment methods currently in use. Conservative treatment modalities are followed by more invasive approaches like arthrocentesis or arthroscopy. The aim of the study is to compare the effects of intra-articular tenoxicam injection and arthrocentesis plus viscosupplementation on patients in which a previous arthrocentesis plus viscosupplementation has failed to relieve pain and restore function. The study group consists of 18 TMJs in 16 patients (15 female and 1 male) and the patients were randomly divided into two groups as the arthrocentesis plus viscosupplementation group (n: 8) and tenoxicam injection (n: 10). 20 mg of tenoxicam was injected to the upper compartments of 10 joints without arthrocentesis. The other 8 joints were treated with a second arthrocentesis and sodium hyaluronate injection. VAS scores and maximum mouth opening with and without assistance were recorded in the post operative first week, first month and third month. The results show that there is little benefit in using relatively conservative methods once an arthrocentesis together with viscosupplementation has failed to relieve the patients pain. It is concluded that more invasive procedures should be considered for the patients who do not benefit from arthrocentesis. (C) 2013 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectDiş Hekimliği
dc.subjectCerrahi Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectCERRAHİ
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectDİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ, ORAL CERRAHİ VE TIP
dc.titleThe next step in the treatment of persistent temporomandibular joint pain following arthrocentesis: A retrospective study of 18 cases
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
dc.contributor.departmentMed Pk Private Bahcelievler Hosp , ,
dc.identifier.volume42
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.contributor.firstauthorID26086


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record