Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCakmak, Bahar
dc.contributor.authorAktas, Ilknur
dc.contributor.authorAkgun, Kenan
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-03T11:34:53Z
dc.date.available2021-03-03T11:34:53Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.citationAktas I., Akgun K., Cakmak B., "Therapeutic effect of pulsed electromagnetic field in conservative treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome", CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, cilt.26, sa.8, ss.1234-1239, 2007
dc.identifier.issn0770-3198
dc.identifier.otherav_28bbcfb3-7e79-4ed9-84af-abc85db8efd0
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/32230
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-006-0464-2
dc.description.abstractSubacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) is a frequent cause of shoulder pain. Our purpose in this double-blinded, randomized, and controlled study was to demonstrate whether the pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) provides additional benefit when used with other conservative treatment modalities in acute phase rehabilitation program of SIS. Forty-six patients with unilateral shoulder pain who had been diagnosed as having SIS were included in this trial. The cases were randomly separated into two groups. All cases received a treatment program for 3 weeks consisting of Codman's pendulum exercises and subsequent cold pack gel application on shoulders with pain 5 times a day, restriction of daily activities that require the hands to be used over the head, and meloxicam tablet 15 mg daily. One group was given PEMF; the other group was given sham PEMF daily, 25 min per session, 5 days per week for 3 weeks. Shoulder pain during rest and activity and which causes disturbance of sleep was evaluated using a visual analogue scale, and total Constant score investigated shoulder function. Daily living activities were evaluated by shoulder disability questionnaire. Results were assessed before and after treatment. When compared with the baseline values, significant improvements in all these variables were observed at the end of the treatment in both groups (p 0.05). There is no convincing evidence that electromagnetic therapy is of additional benefit in acute phase rehabilitation program of SIS.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectİç Hastalıkları
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectROMATOLOJİ
dc.subjectİmmünoloji ve Romatoloji
dc.titleTherapeutic effect of pulsed electromagnetic field in conservative treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalCLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY
dc.contributor.department, ,
dc.identifier.volume26
dc.identifier.issue8
dc.identifier.startpage1234
dc.identifier.endpage1239
dc.contributor.firstauthorID184002


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record