Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorCatroux, Melanie
dc.contributor.authorDulovic, Olga
dc.contributor.authorPehlivanoglu, Filiz
dc.contributor.authorPARLAK, Emine
dc.contributor.authorJohansen, Isik Somuncu
dc.contributor.authorKursun, Ebru
dc.contributor.authorPARLAK, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorYILMAZ, EMEL
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Gulden
dc.contributor.authorGul, Hanefi Cem
dc.contributor.authorOncul, Oral
dc.contributor.authorSimeon, Soline
dc.contributor.authorTattevin, Pierre
dc.contributor.authorULU KILIÇ, AYŞEGÜL
dc.contributor.authorALABAY, Selma
dc.contributor.authorBeovic, Bojana
dc.contributor.authorSavic, Branislava
dc.contributor.authorHansmann, Yves
dc.contributor.authorHarxhi, Arjan
dc.contributor.authorŞENER, ALPER
dc.contributor.authorOzkaya, Hacer Deniz
dc.contributor.authorCag, Yasemin
dc.contributor.authorAgalar, Canan
dc.contributor.authorVahaboglu, Haluk
dc.contributor.authorUĞUR, BERNA KAYA
dc.contributor.authorHasbun, Rodrigo
dc.contributor.authorSengoz, Gonul
dc.contributor.authorYasar, Kadriye
dc.contributor.authorİNAL, AYŞE SEZA
dc.contributor.authorSulaiman, Tarek
dc.contributor.authorMedi, Sai
dc.contributor.authorErdem, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorSenbayrak, Seniha
dc.contributor.authorOzturk-Engin, Derya
dc.contributor.authorInan, Asuman
dc.contributor.authorCivljak, Rok
dc.contributor.authorNechifor, Mihai
dc.contributor.authorAKBULUT, AYHAN
dc.contributor.authorCrisan, Alexandru
dc.contributor.authorOzguler, Muge
dc.contributor.authorNamiduru, Mustafa
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-02T16:47:03Z
dc.date.available2021-03-02T16:47:03Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationSulaiman T., Medi S., Erdem H., Senbayrak S., Ozturk-Engin D., Inan A., Civljak R., Nechifor M., AKBULUT A., Crisan A., et al., "The diagnostic utility of the "Thwaites' system" and "lancet consensus scoring system" in tuberculous vs. non-tuberculous subacute and chronic meningitis: multicenter analysis of 395 adult patients", BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, cilt.20, sa.1, 2020
dc.identifier.issn1471-2334
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_495b5428-5969-4bf7-8903-870f980a7dd3
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/3279
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-05502-9
dc.description.abstractBackground Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) represents a diagnostic and management challenge to clinicians. The "Thwaites' system" and "Lancet consensus scoring system" are utilized to differentiate TBM from bacterial meningitis but their utility in subacute and chronic meningitis where TBM is an important consideration is unknown. Methods A multicenter retrospective study of adults with subacute and chronic meningitis, defined by symptoms greater than 5 days and less than 30 days for subacute meningitis (SAM) and greater than 30 days for chronic meningitis (CM). The "Thwaites' system" and "Lancet consensus scoring system" scores and the diagnostic accuracy by sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve of receiver operating curve (AUC-ROC) were calculated. The "Thwaites' system" and "Lancet consensus scoring system" suggest a high probability of TBM with scores = 12, respectively. Results A total of 395 patients were identified; 313 (79.2%) had subacute and 82 (20.8%) with chronic meningitis. Patients with chronic meningitis were more likely caused by tuberculosis and had higher rates of HIV infection (P < 0.001). A total of 162 patients with TBM and 233 patients with non-TBM had unknown (140, 60.1%), fungal (41, 17.6%), viral (29, 12.4%), miscellaneous (16, 6.7%), and bacterial (7, 3.0%) etiologies. TMB patients were older and presented with lower Glasgow coma scores, lower CSF glucose and higher CSF protein (P < 0.001). Both criteria were able to distinguish TBM from bacterial meningitis; only the Lancet score was able to differentiate TBM from fungal, viral, and unknown etiologies even though significant overlap occurred between the etiologies (P < .001). Both criteria showed poor diagnostic accuracy to distinguish TBM from non-TBM etiologies (AUC-ROC was <. 5), but Lancet consensus scoring system was fair in diagnosing TBM (AUC-ROC was .738), sensitivity of 50%, and specificity of 89.3%. Conclusion Both criteria can be helpful in distinguishing TBM from bacterial meningitis, but only the Lancet consensus scoring system can help differentiate TBM from meningitis caused by fungal, viral and unknown etiologies even though significant overlap occurs and the overall diagnostic accuracy of both criteria were either poor or fair.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectYaşam Bilimleri (LIFE)
dc.subjectBULAŞICI HASTALIKLAR
dc.subjectİmmünoloji
dc.subjectYaşam Bilimleri
dc.subjectTemel Bilimler
dc.titleThe diagnostic utility of the "Thwaites' system" and "lancet consensus scoring system" in tuberculous vs. non-tuberculous subacute and chronic meningitis: multicenter analysis of 395 adult patients
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalBMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES
dc.contributor.departmentBakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research & Training Hospital , ,
dc.identifier.volume20
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.contributor.firstauthorID2359439


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster